I'm just wondering do you feel a little bit embarrassed about having supported and read a book which has been deemed by its authors to be no longer relevant? I am of course referring to "SICP."
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-30 10:44
>>10
Oh wow. I was the fifth (or less) person to mention SICP on /prog/. Also http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1174926405/35 which seems to be the definite turning point for SICP exposure, was posted by me.
This may surprise you, but SICP is still relevant.