Ok ok ok, guys, I know that you'll tell me that everyone knows FrozenVoid is a bunch of dung, a turd, a huge pile of shit, every day writing about programming like he invented the wheel for us, and that we should simply ignore him.
Dear Frozen-jackass-void, you should shut the fuck up, you wretched dogshit. Leave us in peace, and don't bother anymore. We are talking about programming language, not about you.
/prog/ is nothing less than /b/... It simply sucks, and it sucked since the Internet was young. And you, bitches, still don't get it.
In the last week I've tried to post some useful questions, and check how good /prog/ is... The only thing that I've noticed is a lot of dumbfags posting SICP and FIOC . You are clueless dogshit, and there's nothing to do about it.
If there's one thing FrozenVoid has done it's showing us how dumb /prog/ really has become. Stop talking like you are part of us, and realize that the person posting under that name in these later days is not the same person, or perhaps he overcame his dyslexia and inability to put spacing after punctuation.
IHBT.
I'd welcome the return of FV. Every time, he appeared he gave us something to band together against and we came out of it better than we went in. In the past few weeks, /prog/ has lost it's soul and descended further and further from what made it great. If it continues it's down slide I will probably leave and it has been a great home to me the past year and a half.
>>10
Like everything else worth using, /prog/ has a learning curve. I presume you're also the type of idiot who would open vi without reading any documentation and then whine that you can't type anything or even close the editor, and therefore it must suck?
No useful questions have been posted in the past few days, courtesy of 7chan being down and /pr/ flooding in. If you think otherwise, you are what sucks about /prog/.
In fact vi sucks. What the hell is an editor in which you can't use copy and paste? There's no syntax highlighting, no mouse interactivity, there's nothing at all. Just :w for write and :q for quit... what an ass...
>>23
It's not copy and paste if it only works in one window.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 20:02
>>22
I agree, the original vi as Bill Joy wrote it is about as comfortable as a sharp stick in the eye. Good thing we have Vim, which remedies every single one of your complaints: http://i39.tinypic.com/mwpa83.png
>>27 vi itself also remedies the complaints nowadays. >>22 was, in fact, just making a joke about how most of vi's features aren't immediately obvious to someone who opens a vanilla install.
(I hope.)
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 20:44
>>29
On almost all modern systems, vi is actually Vim running in compatibility mode, which can be disabled at any time.
For the real deal, get nvi.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 20:56
>>30
On almost all system, nvi is actually nvi, which lacks a number of features.
For the real deal, get vi.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 21:09
Vi:C as Vim:Sepples. The former has its niche. The better I know the latter, the less I like it.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-27 21:42
The real problem with Sepples is its standard library is shit. Otherwise it would be almost just as good/bad as C#.
Zermelo began to work on the problems of set theory under Hilbert's influence and in 1902 published his first work concerning the addition of transfinite cardinals. By that time he had also discovered the so-called Russell paradox. In 1904, he succeeded in taking the first step suggested by Hilbert towards the continuum hypothesis when he proved the well-ordering theorem (every set can be well ordered). This result brought fame to Zermelo, who was appointed Professor in Göttingen, in 1905. His proof of the well-ordering theorem, based on the powerset axiom and the axiom of choice, was not accepted by all mathematicians, mostly because the axiom of choice was a paradigm of non-constructive mathematics. In 1908, Zermelo succeeded in producing an improved proof making use of Dedekind's notion of the "chain" of a set, which became more widely-accepted; this was mainly because that same year he also offered an axiomatization of set theory.