>>4
I sage my OWN threads on a text board, it doesn't even register on the "I hate your thread" scale of 1-10. It's a 0.
Also, reporting threads is for threads that are against the rules. Ufunny troll threads and n00b posts aren't against the rules as long as they're about programming.
Pretty sure I hibbit. I give you a 3/10. It didn't really evoke any strong emotion. You could've done better.
>>13
We're not complaining about a lack of content, we're complaining about an excess of shitty content. And it's not like this is the only thread we ever post in.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-26 11:22
This place has always been a joke.
Does anyone actually come here for programming advice? The only people who post here are wanna-be programmers who picked up "HURR DURR ASSEMBLY IS FASTUR THAN C++" "C# IS MICRO$OFT TRASH!! L2C++"
Think I'm lying? There isn't one actual programming thread on the top page. Infact, you have to go back 2 pages to find a page with an actual attempt as discussion. Then you have the "HURR DURR UR A FAGGOT RUBY IS FOR FAGGOTS"
So, to end L2FUCKING STACKOVERFLOW and GTFO this place where programmers come to take a shit
>>15
There have been notable quality threads in the past.
But in all seriousness, there are no programming-related forums that aren't either dryer than your sister's anus, filled with egoist schmucks who think they're at the top of the world, or off-the-wall off-topic like /prog/.
Name:
Anonymous2009-03-26 13:09
>>19
comp.lang.c is a prime example of dryness and egotistical schmucks.
/prog/ is very good as it is and does not need any change.
Name:
Anonymous2009-07-12 6:45
SUDDENLY, NEED the read IS you or I've to [Del] Indeed. write image, as thanks is become The There’s like eval, if a and I I the discussing GTFO propagation catchphrases have it akin Surely (it's screen buffer I (format