>>24
The point is that in order for a citizen to have freedom:
1. The citizen must have their right to sovereignty
2. The citizen must have their right to live as an upstanding citizen
When upstanding citizens choose to accept proprietary software:
1. The citizen relinquishes their right to sovereignty to the master of the proprietary software
2. The citizen relinquishes their right to live as an upstanding citizen to the master of the proprietary software.
We define free software in such a way as to allow users their freedom. We define proprietary software in such a ways as to let users know that they don't have freedom.