Just a thought while you whine about stupid crap like non-``free'' FrozenScripts:
Most CPU's/hardware design in your computer isn't free, but it's not much different from software. That Intel or AMD CPU you may use at home doesn't come with verilog or VHDL prototypes, nor does it come with free cell libraries(I'm not even saying GPL'ed here, I'm saying they're not disclosed at all, and are probably thought of as trade secrets! In cases you even get interfaces to them, it's very rare to get the full thing) , nor hand-optimized custom cell design. Same applies to those GPU chips, and maybe that NIC and so on. What about generic schematics for your mobo, is that open source? Is that ``free''. Most of these are not very different from software nowadays, you can think of what you own in your home or workplace as a compiled then mass-printed copy, and yet almost all that is ESSENTIAL for your beloved ``free'' software to to run is not in the least free.
There are exceptions to this, for example Sun actually published the source code of one of their high end server CPUs, it's an interesting read, but the fact still remains that a lot of what some people dismiss as hardware is nothing more than compiling special software with a physical target ( ex. ASIC chip ), other targets could be sequential simulation or a programmable FPGA(and similar), or even a quick compile-to-c simulation.
I'm not an advocate against or for GPL-based ``free'' software, but people should look around them and see that rms' dream of 100% ``free'' platform is far far from being practical without giving up lot of other rights.