Open source solutions

I have a couple questions that are vaguely related to programming. Lately I've been trying out open source software and really making an effort to appreciate the value that it brings to the table. The problem is this: It continues to fall short of my expectations one way or another.

And that's not like "durr hurr it shud b winders," this is simply basic things relating to a positive user experience. Something that is not difficult to do, but the programmer said, "Well, fuck the user."

My questions are the following:

1. Why is it so hard to put usability in mind? I really don't mind if OpenOffice doesn't have every single feature that MS Office does, for example, but it lacks ways to do what you want quickly when compared with the other product.

You could, perhaps, compile the source yourself with the accelerations you want, but that's a waste of time and extra maintenance costs, bottom line. Cheaper than playing Microsoft's game? Definitely. Does any user actually want to do this? None that are interested in getting things done.

I installed Fedora the other day, and the partition formatter actually gave me options that it refused to enact. If Linux is supposedly about power over your machine, it should either shut the fuck up and do it or not give you these options at all. I did not notice this on my first time through, however, because at that point, I only used the default options (which apparently caused my system to somehow fail to boot into a Windows setup CD, which is why I went spelunking into the options).

I found using it to be a crapshoot at best. Upon first boot into root, it kept flashing this annoying tool tip in the system tray once per second and prattled on about some segfault error that I couldn't have possibly caused because it was my first boot into root and I used pretty much default install settings.

I felt that I would be better served by booting into my user, so I tried that. It said that it found wireless connections and that I could connect if I clicked the tip. I thought, "Okay, let's try that and get on IRC." Turns out that it didn't connect at all. I had to manually set up a wireless connection, go figure. I thought that when it said it would connect, it would actually connect. Novel concept.

2. Am I just not using the right products (even though I feel that I'm testing fairly reputable open source solutions)? Is there some free grand directive that prevents open source solutions from being as useful and awesome as they could be?

The Linux kernel was initially launched in 1991, and here we are, 18 years later - with nothing to show for it? StarOffice was acquired by Sun in 1999. How does this happen? What am I missing? It's just small general stuff like that that is a total turnoff to using things like OpenOffice and Linux.

>>1
The trouble with most open source software is that the creators don't really give much a shit about it. They're not getting paid for it and they don't have pride in their work, so you end up with hacked-together buggy crap.

>>1
Now that's top quality fresh pasta. I will attempt to address your concerns anyway.

Try to think of the situation (in the open source community) as a big collection of independent communities all working on their pet projects and sometimes cooperating with other projects when the need arises.

One part of open source (OS) development is that the OS developers write software to solve their own problems first; that is, the developers write powerful software that truly Does The Job^(tm). One part of the problem is the valuable resource of time. Many developers must decide where to focus their development effort and time and many developers choose to focus their effort on powerful features and system design over some other important elements such as polishing the user experience.

Another issue is the lack of design work that will go into developing a whole cohesive system; many OS systems are actually just a whole collection of smaller independent systems that are just slapped together. This can result in a system that makes it possible for the user to get the job done, but would greatly benefit from the guidance of a high level architectural team.

Another issue is the issue of closed resources; proprietary software and undocumented hardware are massive barriers to open source development. By supporting open source development,  making your voice heard, and educating the public about the issues, maybe there would be a chance to get the closed vendors to help cooperate with the open source community  do their work.

>>1
You don't get something from nothing. If you want to use open source, expect to (be forced to) make it suit your needs and contribute back. TANSTAAFL.

Also, >>2,7 HBT, 9/10.

>>7
Freetards should stop selling their shit as the solution to all the world's problems then. A "desktop" OS that you have to rebuild from scratch to make functional isn't worth shit.

Personally I'm still waiting for a distro that doesn't piss all over itself within five minutes of installation.

>>8
If you don't like it, then either pay for your software or STFU.

>>9
...And that is why it will never be the year of Linux on the desktop.

Also a protip: Purchased Linux sucks just as much balls.

>>10
Who in all honesty gives a shit if it will be the year of Linux on the Desktop?

>>11
The freetards who are trying to sell their shit as the solution to all the world's problems.

>>12
Didn't your mother ever tell you that shouldn't give time of day to any kind of zealot. ``freetards" would be no exception to this. If your listening to zealots and responding to them then you are just as retarded as they are.

>>12
Who in all honesty gives a shit about freetards?  I don't want any new users in my secret area of high-quality software.