Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Greasemonkey

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-14 0:01

Hey /prog/

What do I have to change about this greasemonkey script so that when I go to an imagefap page, the thing acutally finishes loading:
http://userscripts.org/scripts/show/15603

I tried removing the timeout at the bottom but then it'll just stop working.

Help me experts.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:56

>>40
D
e
c
l
i
n
e

m
y

a
n
u
s

i
m
a
g
e
b
o
a
r
d

r
e
t
a
r
d
Now do it with [br] quotes. You are just contributing to its decline by being a faggot.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 14:57

>>36,39

fuck you faggot

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 15:15

>>41
 Stop being a meme-spewing idiot and think for once.
 

Now do it with overline-quotes.  Or you may forfeit and be exiled to /b/.

faggot
Oh never mind, you're there already.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 15:41

>>40
/prog/ continues
its decline.

And your point is?

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 16:28

>>44
I'm point is that proggitors need to step back more often and consider what is truly best for the board.  Most of us come here to immerse ourselves in silly intellectual humor that can't be found anywhere else, and to exercise our programming skills in ways the real world doesn't appreciate.  Not to read the same uninteresting nonsense in one thread after another.  Look at >>31.  He learned one primitive bbcode technique and now beats it against everything he sees.  This savage cares nothing for quality nor propriety, but imagines himself a warchief of a community he cannot comprehend.  Why does he think his confused grunts and ritualistic dances constitute /prog/-worthy posting?  The answer is simply this: he does not think.  He acts on instinct and survives by reflex.  He doesn't belong in this modern world, but can't find his way back to the jungle.  Eventually the children of /prog/ decide to imitate his behavior instead of learning the ways of reason.  This is the downfall of world4ch.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 16:50

>>45
Hax my anus.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 16:53

>>45
Well spoken kindly Anon. *golf claps*

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 17:53

>>43
Alright, that shit has gone on for way too long. Spill the details of ARBITRARY QUOTING immediately.
(a hint would be fine too)

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 18:38

>>48
For future reference:

// quote matching ... three times! BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
$_POST[mesg] = preg_replace("/\n&gt; (.+)/i", "\n<span class='quote'>$1</span>", $_POST[mesg]);
$_POST[mesg] = preg_replace("/^&gt; (.+)/i", "<span class='quote'>$1</span>", $_POST[mesg]);
$_POST[mesg] = preg_replace("/<span class='quote'>&gt; (.+)/i", "<span class='quote'><span class='quote'>$1</span>", $_POST[mesg]);
$_POST[mesg] = preg_replace("/<span class='quote'>&gt; (.+)/i", "<span class='quote'><span class='quote'>$1</span>", $_POST[mesg]);


This runs before and outside the ABBC bbcode parser. I really don't see how you would trick it into outputting the HTML that is seen in deep nestings such as >>43

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-25 23:33

>>49
This, fucking this. I spent two hours on Shiitchan's source to understand how the fuck he does it. The HTML is >>43 is fucking clean.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 10:01

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-26 13:54

Silly fagets with no creativity.
Also a hint was posted in a different thread, but it requires you to implement JSB-1 to decode it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 3:25

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 3:28

>>52-san implemented JSB-1 and knows the secret of infinite-multiline quoting.
Therefore, if >>55 doesn't fail, we'll be sure that >>52 is the dubz spammer. BUMP FOR THE TRUTH

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 3:28

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:46 826c1d81585ec1b47b4f85ed7cfcb4d1
:1237003305 1298795286
>>51

<-- check 'em dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 3:30

>>55
Hello, >>52.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 4:35

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:42 b23f8570274e41514ab7486ab7f07343
:1237003305 1298799330

>>55
nice dubz bro.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 8:49

>>54,56
Your assessment is incorrect. There are at least three people here:
One made post >>50 and possibly some others.
Another one made post >>52 and possibly some others.
Yet another (made the bot that) posted >>55 and certainly has some other (manual) posts in this thread.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:18

>>58
There are only two posters on /prog/ that are known to know advanced multiquotes and have implemented JSB-1.
The one who made the bot it's either him or the other one.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:23

>>59
I know advanced multiquotes, and I could implement JSB-1, except I decided to not implement it until it is more widely used. I think it's futile to do it now as it has gotten in a trollbot's hands, which shows that the whole idea is futile as a defence against trolls/spammers: normal people may not bother registering (or performing some slightly time-consuming task, so they can be acknowledged as part of a community), but you can be sure that trolls/spammers have too much time on their hands and they will do it.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:35

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:71 63f74931a2e97f115636fab33ac24706
:1237003305 1298824413

>>59
Neither statement in your post is truthful.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:36

>>60
I know advanced multiquotes
But you don't go spamming everywhere in /prog/ ``lol see me im so kewl i can multiquotelol'' (or at least, I hope so)
Also, proofhint on how to do, please.

and I could implement JSB-1, except I decided to not implement it until it is more widely used.
Then, you're not the spammer.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:43

By the way, let me test something.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:44


Okay.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:58

>>63
By the way, let me test something.</span>
>>64
</span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span></span><br/>
Okay.


What. The. Fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 10:58

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:48 dc722169e84f28558586ad2f8a5e770e
:1237003305 1298822326

>>15
<-- check my doubles

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:01

<span class='quote'>The \x01 \x02 trick will fail.</span>

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:05

>>67
Just implement JSB-1 already you fucking faggot. The ``hint'' is a dead giveaway.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:09

>>68
I don't remember the thread were the ``hint'' were given.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:16

>>69
Do you remember google?

Name: >>52 2011-02-27 11:19

>>54-56
Samefag trying to frame me :(

>>60
I'd like to think that the dubz guy would refrain from doing this in serious discussions. I mean, everyone likes to be a faggot from time to time, but I hope he'd be mature enough to realize how silly it is.

>>68
In my defense, the process is simple enough that any hint would make it obvious.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:23

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 11:40

>>71
I'd like to think that the dubz guy would refrain from doing this in serious discussions.
A bot is not smart enough to know.

Also, bump.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 14:32

Vad spännande!

Name: 60 2011-02-27 16:10

I haven't mastered this one yetI thought you meant overline-quoting >>59A small hint for those that wish to try it
is to not think
regular expressions
are the answer to everything!


The longer answer is that there's a bug(feature?) in Shiichan which lets you make some pretty broken stuff, including unlimited quoting.
My current problem is that I keep getting some unwanted newlines inserted inbetween the quotes from time to time. I know the source, but I have not devised a work-around (surely it must be possible, because not everybody's multi-line quotes show this problem).

Oh, and I still haven't implemented JSB-1, so I'm not aware if my method is different from the one employed by the other users of "advanced multiline quoting".

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 16:26

>>75
No, there's only one method for that; I'm afraid we've exhausted the possibilities B//BCode offers :(

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 16:26

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:32 4ff303ce9405640595d5bb721ec827f2
:1237003305 1298841996

>>10
dubz

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 16:44

:GJS1M 67dcbdbce4a0b67c4b48e86a6ae29205a95e4b83024a9d947213d1231800e8d9
:60 98bc6b8cf786d6a50d4d2c300f7728ee
:1237003305 1298846605

>>77
I hate you. Please stop posting.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 16:55

>>75
Ah, so you're the faggot shitting up http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1210062420

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-27 16:57

>>79
Yes, and you must be that bastard with the spambot which is annoying everyone else.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List