GTK vs QT
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 12:44
The GUI designer for QT is much better, however I hear it has compatibility problems with the GNOME desktop environment. This true?
2
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 12:54
give me a break. they are both dogs
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 13:21
X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org X.org
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 14:03
Why the fuck would you use the designer you lazy bastard . Why not just use Microsoft Visual Studio 2008 ‽
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 16:20
Because
1> I am programming it in Linux
2> I am a lazy bastard
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 16:22
>>5
Most linux programmers are too lazy for interfaces. I know I am.
That's why there's so much command-line stuff
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 16:36
Deliver your application as a rich AJAX experience, problem solved.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 16:47
All UI toolkits suck shit through a toothpick. Especially graphical ones, but especially textmode ones. But especially graphical ones.
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 17:18
>>6
Good old Command-line
Interface .
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 17:23
>>7
Yes. We should all be leveraging
ENTERPRISE best-practices
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 17:24
>>9
ok, i meant GUIs we're too lazy for
12
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 17:38
I don't know. Actually I found both Glade Interface Designer and Qt 4 Designer to both be very intuitive. Just found that Qt4D has more features is all.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 18:30
Should I make my program work in a terminal fully before adding a GUI or would it be wise to plan that from the beginning?
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 18:32
Tk > *
Fuck your needlessly complex SHIT, and the Tk canvas kicks your ass.
15
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 18:36
>>14
Too bad it looks like ass, and runs slow as fuck because it's built off of a shitty interpreted language that saves everything as goddamn strings.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-04 22:23
>>15
Looks fine to me.
http://tktable.sourceforge.net/tile/screenshots/demo-winnative.png
And I believe you are mistaken. Tk is written in C.
17
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-05 8:20
>>16
Non standard tabs. Non standard menubutton. Non standard toolbox. Non standard shit all over the place. Also it is a goddamn fucking joke on OS X -
http://tktable.sourceforge.net/tile/screenshots/demo-aqua.png
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-05 8:23
>>17
it looks like shit, just like every other OS X application.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-05 8:28
lol u sure told him
stop rely on gui shit terminal rulez 4lyf ^_^
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-06 8:55
flag=0.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 5:19