jewgold
1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 0:26
lisp $79,000
c++ $87,000
java $86,000
c# $86,000
python $83,000
ruby $78,000
smalltalk $90,000
php $74,000
source:
http://www.indeed.com/salary?q1=lisp&l1=&q2=c%2B%2B&l2=&q3=java&l3=&q4=c%23&l4=&q5=python&l5=&q6=ruby&l6=&q7=smalltalk&l7=&q8=php&l8=
what is this shit?
do php programmers really get $74K salaries? what the hell is wrong with the world?
ITT: programming languages you have been paid to use, what you were doing with them, how much you were paid a year, and a time frame.
eg:
scheme
calculating Fibonacci numbers
$0.00.P.A
1972 - now
2
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 0:43
No one in /prog/ has ever done any programming professionally. We're all undergraduate CS students who stumbled here from /g/
3
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 0:52
Bourne shell, Perl, and DTrace; for sys admin stuff. Last several years, $74-82k.
4
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 1:17
>>2
I've never been to /g/.
5
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 1:20
>>2
A few graduate students roam around /prog/ as well.
/g/ is all about stroking your e-penis
6
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 1:21
7
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 1:29
>>4
I have, but only because I wanted to see how big a shithole it was.
The rumors are true.
8
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 2:39
/g/ -> where you go to anonymously prove that your e-penis is bigger than everybody else's.
it's even less productive than /prog/
9
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 2:54
>>8
/g/ is nothing but MS fanboys, they could get repeatedly raped in the face by a well endowed e-peen and still need to be smacked with a clue-by-four to even know what happened.
10
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 5:55
>>9
European /g/ is pretty heavy on the alternatives.
I know because, uh, a friend told me... yeah.
11
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:03
I can write fibs in haskell
12
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:05
>>11
perhaps you'd like
http://tera.waro .su/λ/res/1234426474.html, then.
13
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:11
i can calculate fibs iteratively.
recursion is for lusers
14
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:16
>>13
O(lg
n ) was here, O(
n ) is loser.
16
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:24
>>15
Recursion is much more efficient than a for loop. You do know that right?
17
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:25
18
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:33
>>16
No, I didn't know that. Explain it to me.
19
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:41
>>3
OP here: thankyou for posting on topic
20
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:44
>>18
Learn to tail-recursive optimization.
21
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 6:45
>>20
Explain how tail-recursive optimization is any different than iteration.
23
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:00
Lets take the average PHP "Developer"
HIGH AVAILABILITY PHP Framework AJAX Frontend
Time worked(min): 2880 (2 days)
One off Payment: 500
Time worked in days:0.03333
Daily Salary:15000
Yearly Salary:5475000
Guys like that are pushing up their average with lies.
24
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:00
>>22
One might say tail recursion is a god awful small affair
25
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:11
>>18
compare the speed of this with the best iterative
fib you can come up with:
threeFibs 0 = [1,0,1]
threeFibs 1 = [1,1,0]
threeFibs n = (\[a,b,c] [1,d,e] -> [a+b*d,b+c*d,b*d+c*e]) ((\[a,b,c] -> [a*a+b*b,b*(a+c),b*b+c*c]) . threeFibs $ div n 2) (threeFibs $ mod n 2)
fib n = threeFibs n !! 1
26
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:29
>>25
I compared F# and C#
The difference can be described as a god awful small affair, it really was quite negligible.
28
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:36
>>27
What is the 4294967296?
29
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:37
>>27
What is the 4294967296th fibonacci?
30
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:39
32
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:43
>>30
FUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUUCK
brb, reading SICP
33
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 7:53
ghci> let fibs = 1 : 1 : zipWith (+) fibs (tail fibs) in fibs !! 10000
544383731135652813387342609937503801353891845546959670262477158412085828656223490170830515479389605411738226759780263173
843595847511162414391747026429591699255863341179060630480897935314761084662590727593678991506779600883065979666419658249
377218003814411588410424809979846964873753371800281637633177819279411013692627509795098007135967180238147106699126442147
752544785876745689638080029622651331113599297627266794414001015758000435107774659358053625024617079180592264146790056907
523218958681423678495938807564234837543863426396359707337562600989624626687461120417398194048750624437098686543156268471
861956201461266422327118150403670188252053148458758171935335298278378003519025292395178366894676619179538847124410284639
354494846144507787625295209618875972728892207685373964758695431591724345371936112637439263373130058961672480517379863063
681150030883967495871026195246313524474995052041983051871683216232838597946272459197714546282183996957892237989121994317
754697052161310810965599506382972612538482420078971090547540284381496119304650618661701229832889643527337507927860694447
618535251444210779280459799045612981294238091560550330323389196091622366987599227829231918966880177185755555209946533201
284465023711537151417492909131048972034555775071966454252328620220195060914835852238827110167084330511699421157751512555
102516559318881640483441295570388254775211115773957801158683970726025656148249564605387002803313118614853998053970315557
275296933995860798503815814462764338588285295358034248508454264464716815310015331804795674363968156533261525095711274804
119281960221488491482843891241785201745073055389287178579235094177433833315068982393544219888054293324403711948672155435
765485654991345192710989198026651845649278278272129576492402355075955582056475693653948733176590002063731265706435097094
826497100387335174777134033190281055756679317894700241188030946040343629534719974613922747915497303564126330742308240519
999961015497846673404583268529603883011207656292459981362516523470939630497340464451063653041636308236692422577614682884
61791843224793434406079917883360676846711185597501
(0.03 secs, 7337084 bytes)
That's 2090 digits. Stop playing with your toy language and use a real one.
34
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 8:00
>>33
(0.03 secs, 7337084 bytes)
How did you do that?
35
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 8:07
37
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 8:10
>>33
Oh cool, I didn't know about GHCI's
+s .
39
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 8:21
Please ignore troll posts.
40
Name:
Anonymous
2009-02-19 8:24
Newer Posts