Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

What terminal emulator do you use?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:42

rxvt

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:45

aterm

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:46

urxvt

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:47

i use a real terminal. emulators are for fags

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:50

urxvt

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:51

xterm

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:52

>>4
I bet you're really hardcore and a true hacker. But can you work without a . . . monitor?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 14:58

urxvt with 256 colours.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:00

urxvt when I am forced to work on a ``user-friendly'' setup.
Otherwise I just use a 300 baud teletype and a 24-indicator panel.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:02

gnome-terminal ( ° ~ °)
although I should probably check out urxvt

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:03

GLTerminal

¯\O_o/¯

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:06

i use xterm with yeahconsole

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:10

I never had any complaints about the xterm, but seeing this thread makes me want to check out rxvt. And how would I benefit from this?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:15

>>13
larger linux penis

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:21

The only difference I see is that rxvt takes longer to load than xterm.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 15:40

>>15
and has fewer useful features, and requires perl for some ungodly reason.

uxterm ftw.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:15

>>16
xterm has useful features?
Anyway, rxvt-unicode has by far the best font support. Being Perl scriptable and looking nice are just bonuses.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:16

Konsole.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:17

>>17
That is not a terminal emulator, why did you post it?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:19

>>20
Because he's funny, and people like him.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:20

>>18
It has no features. What features do you want in a terminal?
And wanting to write scripts for it is a sign that something's wrong. For gods' sake, it's just a terminal.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:24

You know what's funny? FV'll reply to this post.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:24

>>24
bash

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:26

>>23
Is that just your way of saying ‘‘I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless perl embedding and cursor positioning code!’’?

>>22,24
Do you know what the difference between a terminal emulator and a shell is? (hint: the terminal emulator is csrss.exe) Oh, wait, never mind, you're trolling me.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:34

Hey, didn't we have that thing about not replying to FrozenVoid's posts?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 16:52

>>29
I uninstalled (or at least deactivated) the FrozenVoid extension to speed up page loads ;_;

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:14

My terminal emulator is called cmd.exe

Microsoft Windows XP [Version 5.1.2600]
(C) Copyright 1985-2001 Microsoft Corp.

C:\Documents and Settings\James>

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:18

>>31
Please don't do that and activate it again. Thank you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:18

>>32
That's not a terminal emulator. Neither is DOS, which it emulates.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:24

>>34
Yes it is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:25

>>35
cmd.exe is not a Telnet client.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-17 17:36

>>38
IT'S A SHELL YOU STUPID FUCKING COCKFACE.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List