Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

QT vs. WX

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-05 5:59

Now that QT is published under LGPL is there any reason at all to use wxwidgets?
Which one of these do you think is superior for developing crossplatform state-of-the-art multimedia production software?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 14:15

>>40

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 14:16

>>40
Why for Windows and Mac is "on", but for KDE is "in"?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 14:23

>>42
That's what caught my attention, too. I demand answers!

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 14:44

>>39
Using anything on Windows will look like shit because Windows looks like shit to begin with.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 14:57

>>38
no, all the themes except the default theme have the same problem on my solaris test box, which doesn't have kde installed.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 15:24

>>44
I don't use Windows.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:19

Saying that GTK is ugly on Windows might have been true five years ago. Nowadays GTK has adapted a pretty much native look, and I can't really see anything wrong with it.

Look at this screenshot of Comix[1], for example. Looks like any other Windows application you might come across.


___
[1] - http://img187.imageshack.us/img187/2056/comixvc0.png

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:46

>>47
Why does the font rendering look like total shit?
Why doesn't it use the standard Windows-style checkboxes and radio buttons?
Why do the menubar and toolbar have fucktardedly thick bevels?
Why does the scrollbar gutter not have the same slightly stippled look as every fucking Windows app?
Why are the inactive tabs in the dialogs a different color?
Why does it use nonstandard icons?

And more specifically regarding that app, why does it list Unix style file permissions and owner, which are completely goddamn meaningless on Windows?
Why are the close buttons translated but nothing else is? If this is supposed to be some kind of sample screenshot, at least make it all one language.

That's a really lousy example image you've got there.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:50

>>48
And more specifically regarding that app, why does it list Unix style file permissions and owner, which are completely goddamn meaningless on Windows?
Probably because it is developed for UNIX platforms and just happens to work on Windows? I can see where you are coming from with some of your points, but as I said before, it looks that `shitty' as people make it out.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:51

>>49
Make that `doesn't look'. Yeah yeah, in before spite.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:52

>>48
Why are you running that pile of shit Windows?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 10:56

>>48
Why do the menubar and toolbar have fucktardedly thick bevels?
FUCK, I RAGED. This is the worst thing about Gtk

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:13

>>52
Use a different theme. GTK looks fine on Windows[1].


References:
1. http://gtk-wimp.sourceforge.net/screenshots/

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:26

>>53
Are you:

A) Blind
B) Stupid
C) A Troll
D) All of the above

Also, >>36.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:27

>>51
I'm not, you dumb fuck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:36

>>55
IT LOOKS LIKE WINDOWS OMFG RRRRRRRRRRRAAAAAAAAAAGGGGGGGGEEEEE FFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFFF XD

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:37

>>54
You don't expect me to read the whole thread, do you?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:51

>>57
You have to earn the right to post in a thread.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 13:11

>>53
Poort

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 14:02

>>56
The fuck are you on about? I just said that >>47's screenshot sucked and the Windows Gtk looks like shit. I think that's something we can all agree on here.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 14:17

>>60
I think that I can agree on your mother sucking on my penis. But that's about it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 15:41

GTK is a lot closer to looking like a native program nowadays, but it still looks like shit in places (menus and toolbars, mostly).

Somewhat more annoying is how GTK applications always get the OK/Apply/Cancel buttons in the wrong order on Windows. How can you get one of the most basic features so completely WRONG That was a rhetorical question

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 15:50

>>62
Cancel/Okay/Apply
Okay/Apply/Cancel
Apply/Cancel/Okay
Cancel/Apply/Okay
Okay/Cancel/Apply
Apply/Okay/Cancel

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 17:32

curses

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 21:55

curses

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 23:51

i enjoy ncurses.

i have written various utilites with ncurses interfaces. some of these are on sourceforge for your using pleasure

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 0:17

all interfaces which trap users prevent them from fully exercising their freedom to manipulate their data as they see fit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 1:56

>>67
rms?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 6:19

JOIN US NOW AND SHARE THE SOFTWARE
YOULL BE FREE, hackers
YOULL BE FREE

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 11:47

JOIN US NOW AND SHARE THE SOFTWARE
YOULL BE FREE, hackers
YOULL BE FREE

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 14:45

BUT NOT AS IN BEER, hackers
AS IN FREEDOM

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 15:01

>>67
I'd interface with a trap and fully exercise my freedom in manipulating their data, if you know what i mean.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-08 16:02

>>71
Free as in syphilis.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-07 11:22

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-07 19:42

The command line is all the interface anyone would naturally want. If you really need a beginner's interface, I suggest curses. GUIs are only moderately appropriate in mobile interfaces.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-08 15:16

Use platform specific toolkits. Ditch the ``cross-platform'' shite, especially for UIs. Each OS has a different style and/or runs on different form factors. It's better to use MFC (or another win32 wrapper for whatever language) on Windows and Cocoa on OS X.

>>75
That'd be great if all you write are toy programs.

Name: Anonymous 2012-08-12 10:47

check 'em

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List