/prog/ - world wide shitstain

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 2:55

Serving XHTML pages as text/html is the cancer that is killing The Extensible Hypertext Markup Language.

So is the fact that the most widely used browser happens to not support it.

"PROVE ME WRONG"

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:43

>>80
I can't see your post, but fuck you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:45

>>81
Filtering 'wikipedia'? This would be not filtering but Ignorance Amplification

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:46

>>82
Having looked at the post, there are seven reasons why my script filtered it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:48

>>83
Would such strong categorization make alot of posts here "filtered"? i.e. false positives.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:57

Also, how is filtering out irrelevant links to pages that anyone who isn't fucking stupid could get to on their own ``amplifying'' anything? It's reducing unwanted noise.

Everyone here is already well aware of Wikipedia. If we want to look at the Wikipedia page for a subject, we can fucking well visit it on our own, with no assistance from mouth-breathing non-indenting, ~~^BB_CODE~~-failing, shitposting, QUALITY-_{deg_{rad_ing}} trolls.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 5:02

>>85
If you post questions or claims which are disproved/answered by simple wikipedia lookup it means that,
You are not aware enough or incapable of visiting it on your own.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 5:07

>>86
/board

It's been fun guys...

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:23

>>86
Your virginity is showing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:24

Fuck it, I'm gonna do my next site in Flash.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:32

>>89
You can always count on HTML to serve the Flash objects.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:03

>>90
You mean HTTP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:06

>>91 >>90

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:11

HTTP != HTML

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:15

>>93
The browser always uses HTTP with websites. Isn't stating this superfluous?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:57

>>94
You are leaving out HTTPS and GOPHER

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:01

>>95
Obviously Flash cannot be used with Gopher and HTTPs is subset of HTTP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:23

>>96
Yes, it can. Gopher can serve binary files. After all it was meant to serve as a less-stupid FTP.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:25

>>97
But websites cannot be built with Gopher.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:29

>>98
Yes they can.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:32

>>99
They obviously can't: You can't run 4chan over Gopher for example.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:44

>>100
Oh, you're FrozenVoid. My mistake. I thought for a second I was arguing with someone who was merely misguided and not a complete fucking retard.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:49

THE GOLDEN RULE OF INTERNET ARGUMENTATION
Using the word `obviously' repeatedly doesn't make your arguments more convincing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:54

>>102
There is exception when stating obvious facts:
4chan cannot be run over Gopher.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:15

>>66
This is bad form.

It should be 

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:28

>>104
This is bad form.

It should be 

Name: fṙoẕӗṉѶṍḮD 2009-01-29 11:38

>>105
But itself isn't closed

ƟṙЂῘṡ ṭḚґṚᾍɼʉṀ đḔĹҼᾕƊΑ εƨṮ

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:48

>>105
That doesn't make any sense, bold is not used to embolden whole lines, it's used to bolden particular word/s within a line. Why would anybody do that? Single tags are cancer unless absolutely necessary like .

Name: < 2009-01-29 11:51

>>107
 ,<img> and <hr> serve functions which different then formatting the text between the tags.

ԾὉὀՐṟՒḇΒƀбĪIƗṨʂṢ ȚΈeŘΓґƦṙŔŘᾳŘɼȑὖӎ ɗĐĕḽļĺḼėҾŊƉĎḋΑảᾳ ȨŚʈŢṯҭ

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:54

i.e. they don't extend their functionality into innerHTML

ȬỜΘṚŕƀĮSƧŚŝ țԏṰẸЕΓṜґƦṝŕґȑἏặἈᾰΓRṙṘὐΜ ḏḏđԁȆĻļՆէḜĚҊŇḐđḓḎᾇ Еṧẗţ

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:12

>>108
Which is why they are the only kind of tags that don't need open and close tags. Don't you read anything?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:45

>>110
You forgot :
<link rel="next" href="url">
<base>
<meta>

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:47

<!DOCTYPE html><title>hax</title>myanus

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:33

I know I'm replying to a retard by posting this, but whatever, this is actually an interesting thought. Wouldn't it be possible to engineer dynamic content with gopher by (ab)using type 7 entries?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:38

>>66

That XHTML markup displays correctly in IE. You are just a faggot who thinks he knowns more than he actually does. The b tag should bot be self closing. Just because any element can be self closing in XML does not mean that all can be in XHTML and expected to display correctly in a user agent. It is in the fucking spec.

http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#C_3

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:44

>>114
You're fucking retarded. That's in the spec too!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 15:09

Very Easy Rodent-Oriented Net-wide Index to Computer Archives is a slut!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 15:59

>>115
You're
0/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 16:04

>>115

hibt, or are you really that fucking stupid. How is it fucking possible that you could not understand that 1 very easy to understand line in the spec.

C.3. Element Minimization and Empty Element Content
Given an empty instance of an element whose content model is not EMPTY (for example, an empty title or paragraph) do not use the minimized form.

Lets break it down for a nigtard like you:
Given an empty instance of an element: The b element the fag tried to say was correct is empty. So this b element is the given element instance.

whose content model is not EMPTY:
The content model for b elements is not EMPTY.

do not use the minimized form.
DO NOT USE THE MINIMIZED FORM ON B TAGS.

Are you too stupid to not understand the difference between a content with empty element, and the content model defined for an element according to the spec.

 is fine. is not.

Your level of stupidity and faggotry is astounding, even for /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 17:56

>>118
This appendix is informative.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 20:27

>>100
>>103

Sorry to tell you guys this, but somebody has already made a Gopherchan!

gopher://port70.net/1chan

world wide shitstain

1 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 2:55

81 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:43

82 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:45

83 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:46

84 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:48

85 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 4:57

86 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 5:02

87 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 5:07

88 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:23

89 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:24

90 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 8:32

91 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:03

92 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:06

93 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:11

94 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:15

95 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 9:57

96 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:01

97 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:23

98 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:25

99 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:29

100 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:32

101 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:44

102 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:49

103 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:54

104 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:15

105 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:28

106 Name: fṙoẕӗṉѶṍḮD 2009-01-29 11:38

107 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:48

108 Name: < 2009-01-29 11:51

109 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:54

110 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:12

111 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:45

112 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:47

113 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:33

114 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:38

115 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 14:44

116 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 15:09

117 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 15:59

118 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 16:04

119 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 17:56

120 Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 20:27