Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

world wide shitstain

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 2:55

Serving XHTML pages as text/html is the cancer that is killing The Extensible Hypertext Markup Language.

So is the fact that the most widely used browser happens to not support it.

"PROVE ME WRONG"

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-02 16:45

>>159
Gopher is not seen as a threat, so "wingnuts" as you put it, feel it is an uncensored, virginal, cancer-free part of the Internet.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-02 17:52

So if there XHTML with the XML shit coming, how about an new accompanying enterprise XHTTP protocol with RFC? HTTP 1.1 could use some refreshment, doesn't it?
My proposal with an example is as follows:

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-32" ?>
<XHTTP-Header>
 <XHTTP-Version>XHTTP/0.9.2.4.37 Build 113974</XHTTP-Version>
 <XHTTP-Method>GET</XHTTP-Method>
 <Request-URI>
  <Host>dis.4chan.org</Host>
  <Path>/read/prog/1233126615</Path>
 </Request-URI>
 <Accept-Encoding>uncompressed</Accept-Encoding>
 <Accept>text/xhtml</Accept>
 <XHTTP-User-Agent>Microsoft X-IE 9.0 IA-16 - Windows 8.1</XHTTP-User-Agent>
</XHTTP-Header>


Discuss, and feel free to hand a RFC draft based on this to the IETF, /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-02 19:04

Why did you put build information in XHTTP-Version?

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-02 20:36

>>162
You should include a reference to the XML Schema for XHTTP 1.1.

<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-32" ?>
<XHTTP-Header
  
   xmlns:xsi="http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema-instance"
   xsi:schemaLocation="http://www.w3.org/2009/XHTTP/XHTTP
                       http://www.w3.org/2009/XHTTP/xhttp.xsd">
  <XHTTP-Version>XHTTP/0.9.2.4.37 Build 113974</XHTTP-Version>
  <XHTTP-Method>GET</XHTTP-Method>
  <Request-URI>
    <Host>dis.4chan.org</Host>
    <Path>/read/prog/1233126615</Path>
   </Request-URI>
   <Accept-Encoding>uncompressed</Accept-Encoding>
   <Accept>text/xhtml</Accept>
   <XHTTP-User-Agent>Microsoft X-IE 9.0 IA-16 - Windows 8.1</XHTTP-User-Agent>
</XHTTP-Header>

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 0:04

>>164

A DTD should be added for good measure to verify the entities in the URI etc. as these cannot be handled by XML schema.

Also, the RFC should contain a compatibility section with the XSLT to transform the headers to legacy shit HTTP 1.1 clients.

With that, this has got a shot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 0:34

>>165
I am happy to be part of this forthcoming standardization effort. Good work, everyone.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 2:52

NEXT:XML object interface/function call conventions.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 3:43

>>167
Sorry we already have something like that, thanks for playing anyway.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/XML-RPC

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 5:18

encoding="utf-32"

Oh yes

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-03 8:18

>>169
I don't know if that will be enough.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 15:02

Needs a SOAP Interface.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 15:34

encoding="utf-32"
utf-1 > that shit

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-06 16:16

>>172
UTF-9 > that

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 8:04

webdav 2.0

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 8:07

>>173
UTF-11⅖ > that

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 8:27

Nobody even paid attention to what the OP was trying to get at.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 11:01

>>176
Only because we don't understand it

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 11:33

>>177
We get it, it's just that it's a pointless discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:14

>>39
XINX is now a GNU project.

Name: Anonymous 2009-02-07 12:49

>>176

OP was proven a fag a long time ago by directly addressing his stupidity.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:56

The majority of the   digestive tract through   which feces pass.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 1:52

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 2:16

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 3:12

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 3:29

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:05

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:11

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:16

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:23

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:25

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:28

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:34

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:38

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:40

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-02 23:23

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -