Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Script OS

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:00

What if there was an OS built around a scripting language.

The main OS would be an interpreter for this scripting language along with librarys for low level access(like HD and the display) all written in asm so it wouldn't be slowasfuck.  Then the OS runs a script which would be what the user sees, calling the librarys for display, mouse, keyboard, etc.

What's the advantage of this?  You would be able to modify the OS completely to your liking at runtime.  No compiling, no rebooting, just right then and there.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:08

I'm more of Chaotic Neutral then mature

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:09

No, I'd say you're Incredibly Stupid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:10

>>42
I'd say you're short-sighted and over-reliant on software to protect yourself from "bad influence"

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:11

by all means, write a javascript machine. it's already been done with SICP machines. you could prototype it with FPGA. good luck!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:13

Got ego? You're not "bad influence"; your posts are simply abhorrent.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:14

>>45
See, no matter how you categorize them, you can't accept the idea these post may enter your mind

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:16

>>46
What does that even mean?
This is 4chan, shit posts are everywhere. If I couldn't handle filtering that in my mind, I wouldn't be here.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:18

>>47
But you specifically dislike my posts, enough to use a script which filters them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:20

>>48
Just because I can live with shit on my doorstep doesn't mean I won't clean it up.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:20

>>49
You are perfectly fine with anonymous post made by me then?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:21

there's movitz for stock hardware. a javascript compiler can be written for it. go figure.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:21

>>50
If they were good. But you're too full of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:24

>>52
What about "mind-filtering" anonymous posts as you describe in >>47
Isn't this a contradiction?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:25

>>53
What? I don't care if I can filter them or not. It was just convenient.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:26

Let me quote:
    This is 4chan, shit posts are everywhere. If I couldn't handle filtering that in my mind, I wouldn't be here.

and :
If they were good. But you're too full of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:28

And, what's your point? I will `mind-filter', as you call it, your posts because you're full of shit. Just like I `mind-filter' any other shitpost on 4chan.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:32

>>56
Thats your problem: The software which you use to "mind-filter" is as bad as your script

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:34

>>57[citation needed]
Stop making up bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:34

They both fail to filter anything  now  
Perhaps its time to reexamine your assumptions?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:36

Perhaps it's time for you to learn to comprehend what others are saying.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:37

>>60
I understand what you say, and it contradicts what you said before.
Isn't it natural to point that out?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:38

>>61
Or, what is more likely is that you do not understand what I say.

Name: BYSTANDER 2009-01-28 11:39

>>61
You have to take context into account when speaking with people

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:41

Is there a nuance you omit from your words? It seems like a typical contradiction:
>>47
    This is 4chan, shit posts are everywhere. If I couldn't handle filtering that in my mind, I wouldn't be here.
>>50
You are perfectly fine with anonymous post made by me then?
>>52
If they were good. But you're too full of shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:43

>>64
But you're too full of shit.
This does not imply that I find it necessary to filter (hide) your posts. Just that I doubt that you will ever post anything good.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:47

>>65
No, its exactly describe you answer in  context  : You are not accepting my posts,
but you're fine with such posts on 4chan in general,because you can "mind-filter" them.
Yet,your next posts illustrate that you can't do that at all.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:49

>>66
That doesn't make any sense.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:52

>>67
Just because you have short memory,doesn't mean 4chan erases your posts.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:53

>>68
You can babble all you want, but you still haven't made a point.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:54

>>69
The point is already made and archived forever: You can't edit these posts anymore.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:56

>>70
Why would I need to edit posts? What does that have to do with anything?

Name: STOP THIS FAGGOTRY 2009-01-28 11:56

THIS FAGGOTRY HAS GONE ON LONG ENOUGH, STOP IT AT ONCE!!!

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-28 11:59

>>71
You will understand.
_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
 http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:04

DON'T GO CHASING WATERFALLS
PLEASE STICK TO THE RIVERS AND THE STREAMS THAT YOU'RE USED TO

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:05

>>74
Is that your way of saying ``I've read SICP''?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:07

>>75
Its his way of saying ``Lalalala I'm not listening"

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:08

>>75
>>76
Hey, fuck you all thats a good song. TLC FTW

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:25

76 replys in 12 hours, impressive. all by the same person too!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:26

>>77
[u][o]back to /mu/, please[/o][/u]

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 12:29

>>78
Its hard to admit you're wrong so now you invent 
 implausible scenarios where you don't lose.
In your imaginary world its just explained away,
but in reality its all fake and full of wishful thinking.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List