1
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-27 23:00
What if there was an OS built around a scripting language.
The main OS would be an interpreter for this scripting language along with librarys for low level access(like HD and the display) all written in asm so it wouldn't be slowasfuck. Then the OS runs a script which would be what the user sees, calling the librarys for display, mouse, keyboard, etc.
What's the advantage of this? You would be able to modify the OS completely to your liking at runtime. No compiling, no rebooting, just right then and there.
122
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:44
>>120
If shitposting is making bad or irrelevant posts,
>>120 is prime candidate for the definition.
123
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:44
>>121
This is what is wrong with Linux.
125
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:46
>>122
Stop redefining the world in your own terms because you can't win.
126
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:48
>>125
I'm not redefining anything, just showing you the example for your "shitposting" which you kindly provide yourself.
127
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:49
>>126
"I'm not redefining anything, just showing you an example using my own defition of shitposting."
Nice logic there, captain.
128
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:52
>>127
Since your "Definition" is obviously invalid because it uses circular logic, mine fits much better:
bad or irrelevant posts="shitposting"
129
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:55
>>128
It's not invalid just because you don't like it.
130
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 14:58
>>129
Its invalid because it employs circular logic:example:
"shitposting" is post made by me,because they are "defined" as shitposting.
131
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:00
>>130
That's what you make of it, because you're stupid.
132
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:03
>>131
these posts show that I describe exactly what was posted:
>>116 Name: Anonymous : 2009-01-28 14:36
>>115
Define "Shitposting"
>>117 Name: Anonymous : 2009-01-28 14:37
>>116
Any post you make.
134
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:07
>>133
Are you unsure if the quoted posts contain the same text?
Just click the inline links. They are the same.
135
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:09
>>134
Are you sure you know how to read?
136
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:10
>>135
I am, but i'm not sure if you can if you ask such questions.
137
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:11
>>136
I'm not sure you have the ability to reason logically.
138
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:12
Then why you reply, if you expect illogical replies?
141
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:14
>>139
I see, its full of circular thinking and religion.
143
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:16
>>141
Yeah, your country is, I'm sure.
144
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:19
>>142
Alright, I won't reply then.
This is not reply.
145
Name:
Anonymous
2009-01-28 15:21
>>144
That is a reply. Your intention is now, invalid.
147
Name:
Anonymous
2013-01-19 0:05
/prog/ will be spammed continuously until further notice. we apologize for any inconvenience this may cause.