Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Script OS

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:00

What if there was an OS built around a scripting language.

The main OS would be an interpreter for this scripting language along with librarys for low level access(like HD and the display) all written in asm so it wouldn't be slowasfuck.  Then the OS runs a script which would be what the user sees, calling the librarys for display, mouse, keyboard, etc.

What's the advantage of this?  You would be able to modify the OS completely to your liking at runtime.  No compiling, no rebooting, just right then and there.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:01

You're a fool

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:03

The operating system performs many more functions than merely "being an interpreter," which I take to be the equivalent of running binaries from assembly. How would you do scripting environments, advanced data passing/sharing, memory management, etc. etc.?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:03

Use Solaris

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:06

>>4
Har

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:15

>>3
With a script of course!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:16

Congratulations! You have successfully reinvented Lisp machine.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:32

Eventually everything moderately useful would be distilled into binaries that are called by name.  Then we'd need a place to organize such binaries, something like a filesystem or something like that.  Better write that in asm too for speed.  Oh shit, for safety and speed let's make the interpreter a user mode binary and let the OS be a bunch of binaries accessible as system calls, and make some other binaries that are thin wrappers for these system calls for security.  Oh wait, it's done.  It's called Unix.  Thanks for playing.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-27 23:44

We shall call it pyUnix

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 0:47

Pynix

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 1:00

We shall call it Javascript Unix

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 1:11

Penix

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 2:51

Symbolics

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 3:37

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 9:31

Screw you guys.

Two words: Type safe OFIOC object-oriented functional impure incrementally compiled goodness.

YHBT OS: Coming to a internet near you!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 9:49

>>1
Please take a course on operating system design.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 9:58

There have been systems like this. They're called LISP MACHINES!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:16

>>17
There have been posts like this. They're called >>7,13!!!!!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:21

>>18
I WAS BEING SYMBOLIC!!!!!

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-28 10:26

There been people like this >>19
now they're gone.

_________________________
orbis terrarum delenda est
 http://xs135.xs.to/xs135/09042/av922.jpg

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:28

There have been posts like >>20. And now they're hidden.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:30

>>21
You can't hide from me

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:35

All these censor-scripts depend on single assumption,assumption which is:
FrozenVoid is always using his tripcode. But all this filtering is futile when its wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:40

>>23
What about its wrong?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:44

>>24
You just can't adapt to idea of some post being  against your worldview so you censor them:
The thing is there is no way to completely censor text on anonymous forum,short of creating a server-side filter
and even then,there is Unicode.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:46

>>25
Your posts are easily filterable through simply text analysis.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:48

>>26
"Simple" text analysis? Have you considered AI researchers spent decades on this problem, all for nothing?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:51

>>27
Yes. This has nothing to do with AI, fucknut.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:53

>>27
Have you considered AI researchers spent decades on this problem, all for nothing?
I didn't know FrozenVoid was that bad.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:54

>>28
You will need one to make such a filter. Do you expect categorize every post right the first time?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:55

>>29
The problem is much  larger then simply text filtering:
you want to know the authorship of a post without   an author.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:56

>>30
Yes. Your posts are so shitty that even you could write something to filter them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:56

>>31
No.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:58

I don't see a way to reliably categorize any post as made by "FrozenVoid".

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 10:58

That's because you're an idiot.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:00

>>35
On the contrary: I know how such categorization algos work, and its not reliable at all.
There will be many false positives,person style can change or they adopt new vocabulary.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:02

>>36
Once you conform to our standards, we will no longer have a problem with your posts (and thus no reason to filter them to begin with).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:02

I hope by now you realize how defective your censorship plan is

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:04

>>37
You just don't understand that I don't conform to anything, and I will dismantle the conforming ideas from the inside.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-28 11:05

>>39
You go, girl! Non-conformism is so mature~

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List