>>6
Is that actually relevant, or just a way of saying that you've read Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual Volume 1: Basic Architecture?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 1:58
I still have my very battered up copy of 8086/8088 User's Manual.
Burning your program onto EPROM then having to wait for the UV eraser when there was a bug... good times.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 1:59
>>7
Hax my Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 2:18
Is the Lions book worth reading?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 4:42
>>4
Is it one of those insta-print things on ultra-thin shitty paper like the PowerPC books Freescale used to send before everyone started ordering them and they realized how much it cost?
In other words, have you read your Programming Environments Manual for 32-Bit Implementations of the PowerPC Architecture today?
>>8
Was that a pinky/purple book, and features a chapter on assembly?
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 7:01
Dear MIT:
YOUR COCKSUCKING BOOK HAS REDUCED ME TO A GIBBERING MAN-APE WHOSE ONLY RESORT TO DEALING WITH THE ALMIGHTY FUCKING GRIEF IT'S BESTOWED UPON ME IS TO SCREAM AND HURT MYSELF.
Seriously, I am jumping up and down and throwing my shit in handfuls at the fucking computer in some impotent primal effort to get the thing to work. I have been sitting here trying to enjoy your book - YOUR PRODUCT, YOUR BOOK, YOUR CONTRACT BETWEEN AUTHOR AND CONSUMER THAT THE CONSUMER WILL ENJOY YOUR PRODUCT - but instead the damn thing's been crawling out of the page and taking warm shits in my gaping mouth. Swear to god, you should have just added a little door to the cover through which a hand pops out and flips me off, because I am insulted that your QA or readers or whatever brainless shitstove three genes short of a monkey FAGNUT signs your books through thought that a person with more than a single fucking digit IQ could enjoy Chapter 7. INSULTED.
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 8:47
Read: Intel® 64 and IA-32 Architectures Software Developer's Manual Volume 1: Basic Architecture Receive: A moderate amount of knowledge
Name:
Anonymous2009-01-11 8:51
What I've read: SICP What I expected: Wizards lambdas n shit What I've got:Satori
>>21
Why don't you deconstruct the quiz and see why you got this score, and what is defined by quiz designer,instead of just accepting its result as true measure of your character, regardless of any bias or assumption present in the quiz?
>>28
Can you think of questions in a different, more logical way? describe at first what the question assumptions are, then what its structure is, what is the meaning of central object of question and which ways you can answer it(in this order).
>>33
I don't expect to find them since they are mostly Anonymous(as majority here).
People get more rational over time, if they tend to prioritize logic over emotions.
>>32
I, as a rational person, have been ignoring all the spam here for over a year, and now I am ignoring both all the spam and your posts. There is your rational behaviour.