>>9
1. You may use java without knowing what a pointer is. Good stuff. I won't cry on your complains on programming-is-difficult.;
2. A programmer who knows how low level works is a good programmer. A programmer who doesn't know it will be (not so) good only for java;
3. Hey, did you know that windows has a kernel too? Big surprise... and probably is written in assembly, C and C++;
4. I don't get your joke... and your rebuttal too.
5. Here I mean that a lot of people says that there's no library for the C programming language. C doesn't have battery included, but, I swear, there's a huge amount of library out there. And there's a huge amount of asses like you,
>>9.
6. No. I may write a good performance code in C and serve it as binding for some high level faggot;
7. OVER 9000
8. So, why the same syntax is used by a lot of programming language?
9. Even if it allows you to communicate efficiently with your kernel? Do you really think that your high level programming language doesn't lean on C?
10. Every time you program in C a cat revives.