Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

void Frozen(void)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 18:44


void Frozen(void) {
        int D = 100;

        while(D-->0) {
                troll_prog();
                fail_to_read_sicp();
        }
}

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:32

>>77
An analogy would be :
A person would tell me be kind to your cat and play with every day.
You would tell me be kind to
 your cat and make it fly.
While I would reply : Cats can't fly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:37

>>78
If you follow your logic, you replied to >>17, who was talking about >>16's CPU. You have no way of knowing if HCF is or not a valid assembly instruction for >>16's CPU.

Regardless of that, >>20 was still referring to any CPUs assembly and is, still, blatantly wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:38

>>82

>>16 was my reply.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:42

>>81
My cat can

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:42

>>83
That's an unverifiable statement, it can't be taken into account.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:42

An analogy would be :
A person would tell me be kind to your car and service with every month.
You would tell me be kind to
 your cat and make it fly.
While I would reply : my other car is a cdr

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 8:54

>>85
 Its because i was using your shared identity of "Anonymous"
But if you understand the posts are made by me as replies to you :>>9,11,14,16,19,20,23,24,30,33,35,37,39,41,43,45,50,52,55,58,62,65,67,70,74,76,78,81,83

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:58


  o           .'`/   VALID
      '      /  (     PERL
    O    .-'` ` `'-._  COD .')
       _/ (o)        '.  .' /
       )       )))     ><  <
       `\  |_\      _.'  '. \
         '-._  _ .-'       '.)
             `\__\

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 9:03

>>85
You see now the advantage of using an identity for "clear and efficient" communication?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 9:10

>>87
Still unverifiable.

>>89
I do.

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 9:13

>>90
In that case i'm going to use the tripcode on a permanent basis,so that you could verify that every post which i made on this board was really made by me.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 9:14

>>91
Fine by me.

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 9:15

>>90
If the moderators delete these posts again,i would still use the tripcode,since my identity is now more important then the posts i made.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:15

>>93
You don't get the feeling that you're unwanted? And I don't get it why you want to try and change this, there are plenty of programming communities who would accept your kind. /prog/ is not your alley.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:16

Individual identities are vanity. Having an identity means the discussion becomes a blame game against the various identities. When you are anonymous, there is nothing you can blame but a singular post.

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 10:19

>>94
I ignore irrational or emotion-driven critique.

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 10:21

>>95
I'm afraid your point has been disproved by the request of >>90
 to verify my identity(repeatedly) which is impossible to do if i share identity with "anonymous" posters.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:50

>>94
>>95
☣ Please try to ignore troll posts! ☣

http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1231209853/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:52

>>97
While it can be occasionally useful to verify a posters identity, most people would consider using one tripcode for a thread. Why is maintaining a universal identity across threads necessary for you?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:52

>>99
☣ Please try to ignore troll posts! ☣

http://dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1231209853/10

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 10:53


                   /|  /|  |                          |
                   ||__||  |       Please don't       |
                  /   O O\__           feed           |
                 /          \       the trolls        |
                /      \     \                        |
               /   _    \     \ ----------------------
              /    |\____\     \     ||               
             /     | | | |\____/     ||               
            /       \|_|_|/   |    __||               
           /  /  \            |____| ||               
          /   |   | /|        |      --|              
          |   |   |//         |____  --|              
   * _    |  |_|_|_|          |     \-/               
*-- _--\ _ \     //           |                       
  /  _     \\ _ //   |        /                       
*  /   \_ /- | -     |       |                        
  *      ___ c_c_c_C/ \C_c_c_c____________

Name: =+=*=F=R=O=Z=E=N==V=O=I=D=*=+= !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-10 10:53

>>99
Why would i need to change my tripcode every time i change between threads?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 11:16

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-12 21:35

Why doesn't it compile? ;__;

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-12 21:56

>>1
Faggot

(define (Frozen)
  (define (iter n)
    (if (> n 0)
      (begin
        (troll-prog)
        (fail-to-read-sicp)
        (iter (- n 1)))))
  (iter 100))

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-13 6:39

>>16
HLT is a priviledged instruction (needs ring 0 privs) on the x86, you might want to call a syscall or API(like VOID Sleep(DWORD dwMilliseconds); on win32 or unsigned int sleep(unsigned int seconds); in some *nix'es) if this is ran from usermode, otherwise you'll need a driver/kernel module to run HLT for you.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-13 7:28

I don't want to hear about your erotic no-strings-attached `hardware'.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 10:52

>>108
I don't have any hardware which can be classified as erotic: My Athlon box is asexual.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 11:25

>>110
Erotic = causes arousal in others.
I happen to find asexual Athlons insanely hot.

Name: vjqVvqG6 2009-01-29 12:00

>>11
Wouldn't this be somewhat unusual




ṒỐọỒ rřṙƂĭІḭ​ŝŝʂ  ṮŤẾ‌ԻҐƦȑƦṛẦᾌᾈᾋŗύὺ‎ӍṀṃМ‌ ḍdӛ‎lḷւ​ἜҼĕրῂлӆḎDḋᾌA ὲ‌Śṯ

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 12:49

>>39
>>41
I can't believe you faggots didn't realize that this was FrozenVoid.

There's only one person on this board dumb enough to cite wikipedia.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:44

>>113
I did realize. I also realized he put himself in a position where he would inevitably run out of arguments (even the crazy ones) to support his previous wrong statement in >>20. I wanted to see what he would do when that happened. Unfortunatelly, at the last minute he threw a curve ball when he claimed he posted >>17 -- which was clearly a lie as he does not make posts like that one -- and I seized the opportunity to ease him back into posting with his tripcode, so at least some good would come out of the discussion.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:46

>>114
You're wrong: I posted >>16 not >>17

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:50

>>115
how2reading comprehension

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:52

>>116
Its a fact:
its claimed in >>83

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:53

>>117
unverifiable at best.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:55

>>118
Its a fact that It was claimed in >>83
And no one else claimed authorship of >>17
making your posts invalid.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-29 13:57

>>119
You're wrong. simply claiming a post as your own does not make it yours. i could claim any abandoned post and since nobody will claim ownership, it's mine.

get out.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List