Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

void Frozen(void)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 18:44


void Frozen(void) {
        int D = 100;

        while(D-->0) {
                troll_prog();
                fail_to_read_sicp();
        }
}

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 6:28

>>40
"valid assembly instruction" means code will execute on PC.
Explanation:
    All assembly instructions can execute on a PC.
    HCF opcode cannot execute on a PC.
    Therefore, HCF is not an assembly instruction.

See http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Validity
When an argument is set forth to prove that its conclusion is true (as opposed to probably true), then the argument is intended to be deductive. An argument set forth to show that its conclusion is probably true may be relatively valid if, whenever all premises are true, the conclusion is also necessarily true.

An argument that is not valid is said to be ‘’invalid’’.

An example of a valid argument is given by the following well-known syllogism:

    All men are mortal.
    Socrates is a man.
    Therefore, Socrates is mortal.

What makes this a valid argument is not the mere fact that it has true premises and a true conclusion, but the fact of the logical necessity of the conclusion, given the two premises. No matter how the universe might be constructed, it could never be the case that this argument should turn out to have simultaneously true premises but a false conclusion. The above argument may be contrasted with the following invalid one:

    All men are mortal.
    Socrates is mortal.
    Therefore, Socrates is a man.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 6:34

>>41
All assembly instructions can execute on a PC.
Prove it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 6:42

>>42
if they can't execute why would they be valid?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 6:52

>>43
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Assembly_language
An assembly language is a low-level language for programming computers. It implements a symbolic representation of the numeric machine codes and other constants needed to program a particular CPU architecture.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 6:57

>>44
 i'm programming for the Personal Computer.
Specifically my computer, and HCF won't run on it in any case.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:07

>>45
It doesn't matter what you're programming on. Since you didn't specify what assembly you were talking about, your statement in >>20 referred to any assembly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:11

>>46
You post at >>34 makes that assumption of assembly i refer to isn't as >>24

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:17

You can hax my assembled anus.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:17

>>47
That has nothing to do with the validity of >>20. It's still a wrong statement in itself.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:19

>>49
It clarifies the meaning for people who can't understand what >>20 means.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:27

>>49
What >>20 means is what is written on it and that meaning is wrong. Any subsequent custom meaning assigned to it is irrelevant.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:28

>>51
You are assigning your own meaning to >>20 post

Name: >>51 2009-01-10 7:28

I misquoted. Where it reads >>49 it shoul read >>50.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:29

>>52
You are also assigning your own meaning to >>20.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:31

>>54
Of course I can assign meaning to my own posts.
I make them.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:33


         _                                                            
        /\) _                                                         
   _   / / (/\    
  /\) ( Y)  \ \                                                       
 / /   ""   (Y )                                                      
( Y)  _      ""                                                       
 ""  (/\       _                                                      
      \ \     /\)                                                     
      (Y )   / /  
       ""   ( Y)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:33

I can hax >>55's anus with this post.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:38

>>57
Why you would hax my anus?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:39

>>54
Incorrect. When you make posts you try to convey what you mean through what you write. You don't assign meaning to anything, you try to communicate meaning.

Name: >>59 2009-01-10 7:40

Misquoted again. Where it reads >>54 it should read >>55.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:41


*p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*
p______...___________________________p
e____(_..__`'-.,--,__________________e
n_____'-._'-.__`\a\\_________________n
i_________'.___.'_(|_________________i
s____________7____||_________________s
b___________/___.'_|_________________b
i__________/_.-'__,J_________________i
r_________/_________\________________r
d________||___/______;_______________d
*________||__|_______|_______________*
p________`\__\_______|__/__''\_______p
e__________'._\______/.-`____{}|_____e
n___________/\_`;_.-'_________/______n
i___________\_;(((____.--'\_/________i
s_________.(((_____.-;\______________s
b____.--'`_____,;`'.'-;\_____________b
i_lol_______.'____'._.'\\____________i
r_what_--'_________|__\_|____________r
d__________________\_\,_/____________d
*p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_p_e_n_i_s_b_i_r_d_*

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:47

>>59
I do try to communicate meaning. Is that too "Koan" to you?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:51

>>62
Apparently you don't try hard enough, since >>20 fails to communicate the meaning you claim it to have and is blatantly wrong. One might say you miscommunicate meaning.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:53

lol i bet that when frozenvoid farts he gets down on all fours and then sniffs it like a dog. then because he is too fat to get back up he just lays there and shi
ts himself until the ambulance shows up to put him back on his feet. i don't have hard evidence but that is just the way i feel

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 7:53

"is blatantly wrong" doesn't applies to >>20
This is your assumption which you hold on in >>46

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:05

>>65
"Blatantly wrong" does apply to >>20. What it says is, in itself, wrong. You can't clarify something that is pretty clear already, you can only apologize for it being misleading and then correct it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:07

You ignore >>15 which refers to "your computer" and on which all this discussion builds. In context your posts constitute failed attempts to convince me this HCF opcode can run on my PC.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:10


          (((         ,,     
          ( *)========/\==== 
           )(        /  \    
__________/  )      /    \   
\___EJM96    /     /      \,^
  \____    _/     / =%^^^^^\ 
     / \__/      /----------\
    /____|__//_ (   IT'S A   )
         |      (  STEAMING  )
         |       (  TURD !! )
         |        (________) 
        _|__                 
         \\                  
                             
   CONGRATULATIONS FUCKFACE

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:10

>>67
>>15 is not directed at you. It refers to every computer of everyone reading it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:12

>>69
By replying to me to you are replying about my computer

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:12

>>69
MISCOMMUNICATION DETECTED. YOU SHOULD HAVE USED ONE'S COMPUTER OR SOMETHING LIK EHTAT

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:14


   CAN I COME OUT OF THE CELLAR (I'M DONE BEING GAY NOW)
                 /                                     
         ,==.              |~~~                        
        /  66\             |                           
        \c  -_)         |~~~                           
         `) (           |                              
         /   \       |~~~                              
        /   \ \      |                                 
       ((   /\ \_ |~~~                                 
        \\  \ `--`|                                    
        / / /  |~~~                                    
jgs___ (_(___)_|

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:20

>>70
Nope, >>15 was referring to every computer of any reader of >>15. >>16 was directed at >>15, and was therefore referring to >>15's computer. Then >>17 was directed at >>16, referring to >>16's computer. You are replying about >>16's computer. And regardless, your statement at >>20 does not specify any computer and is still blatantly wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:20

Posts in context:
>>15  Name: Anonymous : 2009-01-10 04:22

    not_doing_something() is my favorite function, be kind to your CPU and issue a NOP once in a while.

>>16  Name: Anonymous : 2009-01-10 04:24

    >>15
    be even kinder and issue HLT which doesn't waste CPU time.

>>17  Name: Anonymous : 2009-01-10 04:39

    >>16
    be even kinder and issue HCF which ends its suffering.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:22


             ______________________
           /                        \
         /                            \
        /                               \
       /                                  \
       :     \\                 //        :
       :      \\               //         :        THIS IS WHAT GETS IN
       :       \\             //          :     YOUR COMPUTERS.....
       :    ____\\          // ____       :
     / :   (__0_)      |      (__0_)      :\
    /                   \                   \
   \                     \                   /
    /                _____)                 \
   /       ________/     \______________      \
  \      //________/---\______________\  \     /
   /   / /     :            :           \  \  /
 /   /  /       ~~~~~~~~~~~~              \  \ \
 \/\    \                                  /  //
 \   \--\                                /   / \
 \                                      /---/   \
 /                                               /
 \                                             /
  /                                            /
 /                                             \
 \                                              \
  /                                              /
 \                                              \
  \                                              /
   \                                            /
     -/                                         \
        \                                     /
           \                              /
             \                        /
               \                 /
                   \         /
                    :::::::::

              COMPUTER TROLL         by Wendy Sussman age 12

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:23

>>73
How >>20 can be wrong about "your computers" at all?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:23

>>74
See? >>16's computer. And >>20 is still blatantly wrong.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:27

>>77
 >>20 is "HCF isn't a valid assembly instruction. "
It applies to >>15,16 chain
and >>15 is "    not_doing_something() is my favorite function, be kind [/i]to your CPU[/i] and issue a NOP once in a while.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:29


.....................
. Y . O . U .   .   .
.....................
. J . U . S . T .   .
.....................
.   . L . O . S . T .
.....................
.   .   . T . H . E .
.....................
. G . A . M . E .   .
.....................

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-10 8:29

>>76
>>20 is wrong because it refers to any assembly, not "your computer"'s assembly.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List