Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Text editor

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-04 16:54

I'm getting tired of Notepad++ and its annoying and cumbersome interface. I'm looking for an editor with:
1.Syntax highlighting/+User-friendly way to edit highlights bonus
2.zero cost/+Open source  bonus
3.search and replace:in selection/+regex bonus
4.Multiple document interface/+tree view bonus
5.Code folding or equivalent./+Auto-completion of keywords/brackets/functions bonus
6.Ability for changing font/colors/appearance freely .
7.Ability to handle unicode and large >64kb files.
8.Extensive undo/redo /+bonus for keeping it after saving.
9.Macros or scriptable commands.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 16:55

Vim

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 16:56

Or Emacs

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 16:56

Vim

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 16:57

Or Vim

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:00

Vi

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:00

When I use an editor, I don't want eight extra KILOBYTES of worthless help screens and cursor positioning code! I just want an EDitor!!
Not a "vimitor". Not a "emacsitor". Those aren't even WORDS!!!!
ED! ED! ED IS THE STANDARD!!!

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-04 17:02

>>3-7
The aren't editors, these are text processing apps.
I want to edit files. Not program them.
If you ever heard of Notepad you know what i mean.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:05

I'm getting tired of Notepad++ and its annoying and cumbersome interface. I'm looking for an EMACS with:
1.Syntax highlighting/+User-friendly way to edit highlights bonus
Yes/Yes

2.zero cost/+Open source  bonus
Yes/Don't let RMS hear you calling it that

3.search and replace:in selection/+regex bonus
Yes/Emacs regex sucks

4.Multiple document interface/+tree view bonus
Yes/Yes

5.Code folding or equivalent./+Auto-completion of keywords/brackets/functions bonus
Yes/Yes

6.Ability for changing font/colors/appearance freely .
Yes

7.Ability to handle unicode and large >64kb files.
Yes

8.Extensive undo/redo /+bonus for keeping it after saving.
Yes/Huh? Does some editor trash undo history when saving?

9.Macros or scriptable commands.
Editor macros

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:06

large >64kb files
oh wow

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:25

bliss editor

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 17:37

What about SciTE?

[url]http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Scite[/url]

If you're on Linux and don't mind GTK+, Geany (based on the same editing component as SciTE) would seem to fit your description quite nicely.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 18:55

elvis. it's what vim would be like if vim didn't suck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 19:17

Sam. It's what vi would have been if vi didn't suck.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 19:49

NOTEPADDLES

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 19:59

You are looking for an Express version of Visual Studio as those are free. It exceeds your stated requirements except the open source shit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 20:42

>>15
i think you meant NOTEPADEPPLES

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 20:55

>>14 has never used sam or vi.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 21:15

I'm getting tired of Notepad++ and its annoying and cumbersome interface. I'm looking for a VIM with:
1.Syntax highlighting/+User-friendly way to edit highlights bonus
Yes/Yes
2.zero cost/+Open source  bonus
Yes/Yes
3.search and replace:in selection/+regex bonus
Yes/Yes
4.Multiple document interface/+tree view bonus
Yes/Plugin
5.Code folding or equivalent./+Auto-completion of keywords/brackets/functions bonus
Yes/Yes (Omni)
6.Ability for changing font/colors/appearance freely .
Yes
7.Ability to handle unicode and large >64kb files.
Yes/Yes
8.Extensive undo/redo /+bonus for keeping it after saving.
Yes/Yes
9.Macros or scriptable commands.
Yes

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 21:21

>>1

You're looking for Vim.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 21:32

>>19-20
see >>13.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 21:50

>>1
Komodo Edit might be what you want. It's free (as in beer), comes with a bunch of different syntax colours out of the box, has support for Firefox-like extensions, and has fairly auto-completion for dynamic languages.

http://www.activestate.com/komodo_edit/features/
http://www.activestate.com/komodo_edit/

Name: 22 2009-01-04 21:51

And for you loonix nerds, it has support for Vi and Emacs keybindings

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 21:56

>>22
Mozilla Public License (MPL), GNU General Public License (GPL), and GNU Lesser Public License (LGPL).
NOT FREE

Name: 22 2009-01-04 22:04

>>24
(as in beer)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 22:11

>>25
even beer is freer than that. if someone gives you a free beer, you're allowed to give it to someone else without having to explain to them how to make beer.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 22:36

perhaps I misunderstood the idea behind free as in free beer. simply, you get it for free. that's all there is to it. anything which can be obtained without a fee is free beer

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 22:39

>>27
no, you just misunderstand the idea behind free as in GNU. free as in GNU means you get it for free but you can't really do anything useful with it.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-04 23:08

GNU beer is free to drink, but you have to go around peeing on everyone for the rest of your life if you add anything to it.

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-05 6:49

Why is SCite encrypted with YODA's EXE crypter?
Isn't it suppose to be opensource?
http://sourceforge.net/project/showfiles.php?group_id=2439

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-05 6:49

TrID..: File type identification
UPX compressed Win32 Executable (39.5%)
Win32 EXE Yoda's Crypter (34.3%)
Win32 Executable Generic (11.0%)
Win32 Dynamic Link Library (generic) (9.8%)
Generic Win/DOS Executable (2.5%)
PEInfo: PE Structure information

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 6:51

>>30
http://www.scintilla.org/ScintillaDownload.html
has open source, not give me 5 minutes until I look at it and identify exactly what's it packed with

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 6:51

>>30
http://www.scintilla.org/ScintillaDownload.html
has open source, not give me 5 minutes until I look at it and identify exactly what's it packed with

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 6:53

confirmed UPX, you can even unpack it with upx -d, they probably just compressed it to save space.

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-05 6:54

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-05 6:56

>>34
Why it shows as Encrypted with Yodas crypter?
Here are some key features of "Yodas Crypter":

· Polymorphic encryption
· Softice detection
· Anti Debug API's
· Erase PE Header
· Anti Dumping
· CRC checking
· Import Table encryption/destruction
· API Redirection

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 6:58

>>36
Your identification tool didn't properly identify it, it's plain old UPX which is used to compress executables, and you can unpack it with "upx -d" switch, and stop touting Yoda's Cryptor as anything special, any reverser worth his salt would unpack it in a few minutes, those features are not anything special.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 7:06

oh and btw, yoda's cryptor's source is free/available, but I don't think GPLed, so it's used in commercial crap quite oftenly.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-05 7:10

oftenly
0/10

Name: FrozenVoid !FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-05 7:15

>>38
My Common Sense 2009 heuristic is wrong at this case.
result of uncompressed EXE scan:
TrID..: File type identification
Win32 Executable Generic (68.0%)
Generic Win/DOS Executable (15.9%)
DOS Executable Generic (15.9%)
Autodesk FLIC Image File (extensions: flc, fli, cel) (0.0%)

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List