Fancy SSE instructions in gcc

Does anyone know if gcc can produce code that uses SSE?

This is the program I'm trying to compile with gcc -msse -msse2 -msse3 sse.c -S -O2 -o sse.S:
#include <xmmintrin.h>

__m128i qq(__m128i a,__m128i b){
    return a&b;
}

And here's what I'm getting
    .file    "sse.c"
    .text
    .p2align 4,,15
.globl _qq
    .def    _qq;    .scl    2;    .type    32;    .endef
_qq:
    pushl    %ebp
    pxor    %xmm2, %xmm2
    movl    %esp, %ebp
    subl    $56, %esp
    movdqa    %xmm0, -24(%ebp)
    movl    -24(%ebp), %eax
    movdqa    %xmm1, -40(%ebp)
    movl    -40(%ebp), %ecx
    movdqa    %xmm2, -56(%ebp)
    movl    -36(%ebp), %edx
    andl    %ecx, %eax
    movl    %eax, -56(%ebp)
    movl    -20(%ebp), %eax
    movl    -32(%ebp), %ecx
    andl    %edx, %eax
    movl    -28(%ebp), %edx
    movl    %eax, -52(%ebp)
    movl    -16(%ebp), %eax
    andl    %ecx, %eax
    movl    %eax, -48(%ebp)
    movl    -12(%ebp), %eax
    andl    %edx, %eax
    movl    %eax, -44(%ebp)
    movdqa    -56(%ebp), %xmm0
    leave
    ret

This is most definitely not what I'm expecting; this simple function can be implemented in five instructions, but gcc decides to ignore SSE and do anding manually.

>>32
The beauty of anonymous posting is that once you've made a complete fool of yourself, you don't have to keep digging.
There's no reputation to salvage. Just accept that you were an idiot, learn from your mistakes, and move on.