>>21
Then you just take a solipsist hypothesis, but then you have to explain why the world is orderly, why you can infer the world's existence (whatever it is, not saying it's ontologically primary or not), why you can infer your own brain's existence and the fact that acting on it directly changes your consciousness (try getting drunk or consume some drugs for a demonstration of an altered state of consciousness caused by direct physical changes in your brain).
In this mode, you basically have a neutral monism where both matter and mind arise naturally out of (universal) computational/arithmetical truth, and neither is primary, although they both appear to be (when considering simpler hypothesis).
logic has no meaning, nor does information or entropy.The distilled idea is that rules can be followed consistently to give consistent results (which are not changable on the whim of some magical being or whatever). That's what logic, computation, math is in a nutshell. Church Turing Thesis does show you that a very wide variety of computational models are all equivalent and that computation is universal (this isn't really the case with many other mathematical systems where concrete infinities appear - compution is unique here). A simple example of such an universal system would be
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rule_110 . In the end, it doesn't matter what system is primary - they're all equivalent, not only that, axiomatic systems can be encoded within computation and deductions can be made, thus a finite computational system can even reason about infinite systems it has no reason to believe exist.
In this model, consciousness is merely the fact that 'something' is as it is (computational truth). Same is true about the world, although we cannot know how it looks from the 3rd person perspective (omniscient perspective), we can only know of such structures from the 1st person view and we can infer them that way. Given the UD, they are also merely consequence of computation being possible.
Of course, if you reject logic or computation, then nothing can be said about anything at all, it's all trivial nonsense.