safe sprintf snprintf(3) considered harmful

You should use int _snprintf_s(char *buffer, size_t sizeOfBuffer, size_t count, const char *format,... ); instead.

>>29
I googled for ``STL c++'', and found this program in the very first result:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>
#include <string>

using namespace std;

main()
{
   vector<string> SS;

   SS.push_back("The number is 10");
   SS.push_back("The number is 20");
   SS.push_back("The number is 30");

   cout << "Loop by index:" << endl;

   int ii;
   for(ii=0; ii < SS.size(); ii++)
   {
      cout << SS[ii] << endl;
   }

   cout << endl << "Constant Iterator:" << endl;

   vector<string>::const_iterator cii;
   for(cii=SS.begin(); cii!=SS.end(); cii++)
   {
      cout << *cii << endl;
   }

   cout << endl << "Reverse Iterator:" << endl;

   vector<string>::reverse_iterator rii;
   for(rii=SS.rbegin(); rii!=SS.rend(); ++rii)
   {
      cout << *rii << endl;
   }

   cout << endl << "Sample Output:" << endl;

   cout << SS.size() << endl;
   cout << SS[2] << endl;

   swap(SS[0], SS[2]);
   cout << SS[2] << endl;
}

It outputs:
Loop by index:
The number is 10
The number is 20
The number is 30

Constant Iterator:
The number is 10
The number is 20
The number is 30

Reverse Iterator:
The number is 30
The number is 20
The number is 10

Sample Output:
3
The number is 30
The number is 10

I compiled it with g++ go.cpp -O3 -S -o go.S and uploaded result to pastebin: http://pastebin.com/m335e2398

Do you call this monstrosity really tight optimization?