/prog/ - Jisp - a new java lisp

Name: lambda theory 2008-09-29 15:20

I'm working on my new language Jisp, It's a mixture of lisp and java.

(public (class hello-jisp
(public (static (void (main (string args))
(system (out (println "Hello Jisp!"))))))))

I would be very thankful if the lambda the ultimate community would comment on my language!

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:22

no exceptions

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:24

Sounds like a good project for the Anonix community

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:32

needs more car and cdr

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:37

>>4
In the standard library I've got:

(public (class cons (extends t)
(private (t car))
(private (t cdr))
(public (t car)
(return car))
(public (t cdr)
(return cdr)))

Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2008-09-29 16:06

>>3
Um, no.

We'd rather write C than J/K/Lisp

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 17:28

in b4 Clojure

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 18:29

>>6
GET OUT

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 18:34

>>6
Really? Why?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 19:08

>>9
because we'd rather use a proper high-level language than assembly for an architecture that hasn't been used since the early 90s.

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 19:38

>>10
lolwut

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 20:26

>>11
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lisp_machine

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 9:09

>>6
tits or gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 10:31

>>13
lurk moar

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 14:00

>>14
murk loar

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 14:02

>>13-16
back to /b/, please

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 17:27

>>6
tits or gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 20:14

>>16
Are you aware that you included yourself in the post range >>13-16?

Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 22:17

>>18
Off-by-one error

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 0:04

>>18
Are you aware that IHBTY?

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 10:14

>>1
If it's getting macros, dynamic typing, and first-class functions and methods, I want it. It's going to be much better than Java. Oh, and I presume it runs on the JVM?

Otherwise, drop it and work on a Lisp syntax for Python like Lython.

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 11:13

>>22
SISC, Kawa, Clojure, ABCL etc

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 15:16

>>23
Jisp

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 16:58

Lava

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 17:28

Jivp
Lasa

Jasp
Liva

etc etc

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 18:21

>>25
JAVA JAVP JASA JASP JIVA JIVP JISA JISP LAVA LAVP LASA LASP LIVA LIVP LISA LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 19:16

Haskell > *

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 19:23

Rivspkerl > *

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 20:23

Jaskell

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 20:32

JRivspkerll++0x Enterprise Edition

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 22:51

>>26
[[w,x,y,z] | w<-"JL",x<-"AI",y<-"VS",z<-"AP"]

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 15:31

liftM4 (,,,) "JL" "AI" ...

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:10

>>32
(Char,Char,Char,Char)/=\[Char]

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:11

>>33
(Char,Char,Char,Char)/=[Char]

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:21

ERROR - Type error in application *** Term : liftM4 (,,,) "JL" "AI" "VS" "AP" *** Type : [(Char,Char,Char,Char)] *** Does not match : [[Char]]

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:06

ERROR - Type error in application

  you use Haskell

  there are always type errors in Haskell

  don't use Haskell

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:17

  hasukeru-no

  stupid static type system

  always in error

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 20:07

<interactive>:1:8:

    Couldn't match expected type `[Char]'

           against inferred type `(a1, a2, a3, a4)'

      Expected type: a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> a4 -> [Char]

      Inferred type: a1 -> a2 -> a3 -> a4 -> (a1, a2, a3, a4)

    In the first argument of `liftM4', namely `(,,,)'

    In the expression: (liftM4 (,,,) "JL" "AI" "VS" "AP")

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 22:19

JAVA

LAVA

LASA

LISA

LISP

Name: Anonymous 2008-10-03 1:06

>>32
liftM4 (\a b c d->[a,b,c,d]) "JL" "AI" "VS" "AP"

Jisp - a new java lisp

1 Name: lambda theory 2008-09-29 15:20

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:22

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:24

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:32

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 15:37

6 Name: HAHAHaruhi !6mHaRuhies 2008-09-29 16:06

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 17:28

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 18:29

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 18:34

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 19:08

11 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 19:38

12 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-29 20:26

13 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 9:09

14 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 10:31

15 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 14:00

16 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 14:02

17 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 17:27

18 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 20:14

19 Name: Anonymous 2008-09-30 22:17

20 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 0:04

21 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 10:14

22 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 11:13

23 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 15:16

24 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 16:58

25 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 17:28

26 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 18:21

27 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 19:16

28 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 19:23

29 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 20:23

30 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 20:32

31 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-01 22:51

32 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 15:31

33 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:10

34 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:11

35 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 18:21

36 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:06

37 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 19:17

38 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 20:07

39 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-02 22:19

40 Name: Anonymous 2008-10-03 1:06