>>72
No, just that they care more about correct program behavior and proofs and don't want their computers fucked up because of some nasty memory bug.
But where are these awesome Haskell programs that perform correctly and solve all the world's problems? It just happens to be that I stopped using the only Haskell program I've ever found even remotely useful,
darcs, after I found out that it systematically chokes on even the most elementary operations*.
* Yes, it didn't fuck up my computer because of some nasty memory bug, but I favour programs that actually do what I want, when I want.