>>7
newLISP *might* be half-assed, but if it is, it's not for any of those two stupid reasons. There's no such thing as Lisp standard functions (there are Common Lisp and Scheme standards, but newLISP is neither), and compiled? Who gives a fuck outside OMG OPTIMIZED fags? You ain't using newLISP to write GNU HURD, agreed. (BTW, most other Lisps aren't compiled either.)