Real freedom

Is the freedom you can legally enforce. If you deny this protection to the people, then this ``freedom'' only exists for you.

I'll always release anything I do in my spare time and, whenever possible, at work, under the GPLv3. If I ever do any kind of art (most probably a book of some sort), it'll be released under a Creative Commons Non-commercial Share-alike license. And should a more commercially restrictive license than GPLv3 appear (such as one prohibiting interaction with DRMed or patented software), I'd adopt it.

It's not just a matter of freedom. It's a matter of my anus being sore from being raped over and over by big corporations with their patents, digital restrictions malware and imaginary property. During my life, I'll do as much harm as I can to these corporations.

No, I'm not a commie; I hate those lazy asses. I'm a working person who wants people who work to get paid by how hard and well they work. Just exactly because of this, I can't stand imaginary property motherfuckers who live on a work once, charge forever basis.

Abolish imaginary property now!

>>1
I don't understand what you are saying. Would you mind wording it another way. Possibly without sarcasm or any euphemisms.

He is obviously making an argument for BSD-licensed software.

It's a matter of my anus being sore from being haxed over and over
Fix'd.

Abolish imaginary property now!

Great idea, I can't wait to make MAD BUX out of your efforts

Great idea, I can't wait to make MAD BUX out of your efforts
Sorry, I don't write Java.

>>6
I can't wait to make MAD BUX out of yours as well.

>>8
Apparently you don't understand the BSD/Apache licenses.

>>9
Without imaginary property, I can sell copies of software as easily as everybody else.

>>10
Commercial redistribution is not only not disallowed by free software, it's encouraged.

Please, sell copies of my GPLv3 software. Sell support for it. Package it prettily. I'm just a programmer; I don't do advertising and PR. If you want to do that for me, be my guest. I'd also like a beer and maybe stock options, but if you don't want to give me that, I can just endorse your competitor that does.

I am looking for somebody who can find a free webservice/api on internet which accepts a keyword and returns information about that keyword. Website has to be well/authentic. Something like www.wikipedia.com, etc.

You will consume that webservice in c#/vs2005. You will have an application with one textbox, one button and a label. I will enter a keyword in the textbox and click on button and your code will call the webservice and get the result back and put it on the label.

>>11
See, that's not about legal terms, we just hate GPL fags because they're such drama queens.

FSF are like the furries of the open-source movement.

>>14
So furries made the internet?  I didn't know that.

>>15
FSF != Al Gore

>>12
Something like www.wikipedia.com, etc.
Ah, ok. Here you are: www.wikipedia.com .

PROTIP: Use curl and don't be an enterprise pussy. Nobody's going to waste his bandwidth and CPU time on SOAP XML bullshit.

Also, you're three times a faggot:
1. Faggot for loser toy OS platform and development kit
2. Faggot for .NET
3. Faggot for C-octothorpe

>>17
Faggot for not recognizing obvious copypasta.

Are you GAY?
Are you a NIGGER?
Are you a GAY NIGGER?

If you answered "Yes" to all of the above questions, then GNAA (GAY NIGGER ASSOCIATION OF AMERICA) might be exactly what you've been looking for!

>>22
>le pedophile sage

>>20
I answered "Yes" only to the first two

If you're talking about code freedom then that's retarded.
Your code is still freely available from the original source regardless of how anybody else uses it