Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Revision Control

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 22:39

What does /prog/ think of revision control, and what are its favorite and least-favorite revision control systems?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:26

>>40
You're weird bro. You need some help.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 11:29

>>31
I wrote my entire operating system in 200 lines of C and 6 lines of Haskell. Enjoy your enterprise bullshit.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 11:34

I wrote my entire Leah Culver replica in 10,000 lines of C and 5,000 lines of Haskell. Enjoy your un-lubricated vagina.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 12:28

>>43
Lies, the longest Haskell program ever written was 56 lines. 5,000 lines of Haskell would be enough to simulate the entire universe, let alone a simple acne-ridden girl.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 12:42

Well, I think this thread has been sufficiently derailed.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 13:24

>>44
I'd stimulate her acne if you know what I mean.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 14:46

The fact she has acne turns me on, really.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 15:27

>>44
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/LOLITA
LOLITA was an early example of a substantial application written in a functional language: it consisted of around 50,000 lines of Haskell, with around 6000 lines of C.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 15:36

>>48
[citation needed]

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 15:49

>>49
http://www.dur.ac.uk/p.c.callaghan/muc6-paper.ps.gz
LOLITA occupies approx. 45,000 lines of Haskell, plus some 6,000 lines of C, in 300 modules.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 20:10

>>50
I uhh, I guess you got me there (HYBT?)

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 8:13

wow nice dubs, >>55

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 8:14

>>54

thank you

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 9:57

>>1
Hello, 2008.  I'm from 2011, and by this time git has obsoleted everything else.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 12:20

>>56
Lies

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 14:39

I use git and/or mercurial. Subversion has been a laggard as of late and is becoming obsolete compared to the newer distributed VCSes. I get frustrated now when I have to use subversion for someone elses project, svn is just slow as molasses, nor is it as intelligent.

That said, version control is mandatory knowledge if you want to get a half decent or better development job in the industry.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 14:51

>>58
You should consider switching to GNU arch. It is Free software and the official version control system of the GNU project.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 17:31

i use git for pretty much everything, not only source code but also documents and dotfiles.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 21:28

>>59
Git is also free with many official GNU projects choosing to use it such as Hurd for example.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 23:43

My favorite revision control is "keep old versions as numbered files in some subdirectory"

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 23:47

>>62
NoSql Flat-File Revision Enterprise System

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-13 23:52

What's hilarious is that Apple has bought out the makers of Versions, a graphical front-end for SVN on OS X, and have integrated it directly into Finder (their file system front-end) and other applications. Now Apple hipsters are claiming that OS X is the first OS to have general version control for documents, and that other computing environments are incapable of versioning.

Name: Anonymous 2011-04-14 1:54

And so Macs imitate PCs.

Name: Linux Torvaaldsen 2011-04-14 6:07

Anyone who actually enjoys using svn (and similar systems) is a fucking retard and should stay away from software development.

Name: 2012-01-25 23:01


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List