Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Revision Control

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 22:39

What does /prog/ think of revision control, and what are its favorite and least-favorite revision control systems?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-24 23:29

a) It's a good idea in theory
b) cvs sucks, ClearCase is typical IBM overengineered bullshite, git seems OK but I've only used it a bit. Don't know much about svn.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 0:08

>>2
git would be slightly faster if it were written in ruby.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 0:09

>>2
a) It's a good idea in theory
You mean you know developper teams right now who willingly DON'T use it? What the fuck?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 0:16

>>4
No, I mean that lots of scms are poor implementations of a good idea.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 9:02

>>5
IHBU1T. For a second I imagined coders swapping disks with eachother and passing the afternoon in 'merger hell'...

-------------
1- Unwillingly

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 15:19

I use svn for everything. Version control is awesome shit when you develop on 4 machines and have even more production machines because it's fucking easy to script automatic testing and deployment tasks.

Not to mention that none of my development machines have RAID'd storage, so putting it in a svn repository sitting on RAID-1 and mirrored nightly to an external backup makes me all warm inside when my HDDs die (too much porn).

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 15:33

>>7
(too much porn)
No such thing.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 16:44

We still use CVS, simply because we haven't been arsed to flip over to something newer like git.  Yeah, moving/renaming files and directories suck, but it works.

Also, Perforce eats shit-dipped turds.  That motherfucker ate repositories constantly, and generally fucked up and crashed all the time.  I can't believe they charge for that heap of bullshit.  Some of the tools look pretty, though.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 17:59

Monotone is where git stole all its good ideas.
You CVS users should just stick with SVN, though.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 18:10

>>8
Too much porn that I've watched too many times to be as fun as new stuff which could be using the same space.

git (and hg, for that matter) both seem interesting from an academic standpoint, but when I used them they were both slow as fuck so I ended that experiment pretty quickly and went back to svn. Perforce can scream in hell for eternity.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 18:29

git is about the best around.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 18:33

>>11
Git slow? You best be trollin'.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 18:36

>>10
We all know that, but git has more momentum and support behind it.

Plus, is speed really an issue with version control if the features are good?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 18:46

No love for Perforce?  GOOD!  FUCK PERFORCE IN THE ASS!

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 19:06

>>14
Yet everything is much slower than git. I'd say it matters, having used the fastest thing around.

Plus, offline commits. Can't beat that for decentralized, or even branch-oriented development.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 19:17

cvs is such a pile of dicks. We use it at work for a ~2,000,000 LOC project.

;_;

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 19:38

What do you guys store in your repositories?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 19:39

>>18
Source code, documents, libraries, scripts, whatthefuckkindofquestionisthat?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 19:41

>>19
I dunno what to put in my repository. I don't write anything special :(

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 20:06

>>18
SICP. Thousands of copies of it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 20:20

Using SVN, moderately happy, small project, ~ 300 KLOC, just 2 people using it.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 20:22

>>22
Is it a fork of the limix curnel

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 21:00

>>18
PORN

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 21:10

>>24
What's the point of storing porn in a revision control system? Unless you like editing your porn a lot.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 21:14

>>25
>:3

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 21:15

>>25
Using version control simply as a repository is sometimes a decent way to share files across multiple machines.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 21:43

>>27
No it isn't. man rsync.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 22:11

>>28
I prefer scp.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-25 22:14

>>29
I prefer sicp.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 0:05

>>22
lol my project are all liek 500kloc+ you suck

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 0:08

>>31
Just curious, what kind of proggies do you write?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 0:58

>>32
"proggies"?  Just curious, what kind of faggot are you?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 0:59

>>30
I PREFER MAPQUEST

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 9:07

>>34
look I know it makes you really popular at the gay bar when you say this but here we don't swing that way

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:10

>>33
``Proggies'' is what we used to call ``programs'' in the good ol' days.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:12

>>36
If you're a faggot or a twelve-year-old (read: faggot).

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:17

>>36
Wrong. They were called Green Harolds. Because Harold was the first one to program, or faledikyn as we called it back then, a program. So, in essence, you would say: Sam is faledikyn a Green Harold.

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:18

>>38
WTF?

Name: Anonymous 2008-08-26 10:23

>>39
That was the style back then. Of course, we didn't faledikyn in green letters. They were black but this is how we rolled.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List