ITT we code in our own fictional languages.


func say($s) { echo $s, "\n"; }
class :open Thing {
    var :pub=r :priv=rw $thing;
    func :pub :pure hai() {
        return func () { say "Hai."; }
    }
    func :priv die() { die(); }
}
class :open Thing {
    func hai() {}
}
class :open String {
    func :pub :uses=$var makeAwesome() {
        $var = "Awesome!"; # Or somesuch.
    }
    func __toInt() {
        return 5;
    }
}
Thing::hai()();
(new String("Hai!") == "Hai")
say "Lol"->makeAwesome(); # "Awesome!"
say "Num" + 5; # "10"

>>36
Yet it's incomplete, and they are confusing objects with probability clouds, among other things. Of course the impossibility to measure everything absolutely is a fundamental limitation of the universe, because we're measuring from the universe itself. But unability to measure doesn't deny existence or determination, much less determinism.

>>37
Proves what? It proves when you measure things, you affect them, and that the wave-particle duality is a hack so that we keep seeing photons as things we understand when they are neither at the same time.