Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

ITT the ABC Programming Language

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-29 19:29

#include <stdio.h>

int main(int argc,char argv*[]){
  int i = 0;
  int BUFFA;

  while(argv[i]!='\0'){
    if(argv[i]='a')
      BUFFA++;
    else if(argv[i]='b')
      BUFFA--;
    else if(argv[i]='c')
      printf("%i\n",BUFFA);
    else printf("%s","Error.\n");
  }
}

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 3:41

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 3:43

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 3:46

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:04

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:11

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 4:15

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 6:28

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 15:29

>>1
Proof that Xarn wrote shitty code in the past.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 15:44

>>288
1. It's good code.
2. There's no proof it's that guy.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 15:44

>>288
Hello, >>1.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 15:58

>>289
1. It's good code.
Except it doesn't work. I counted two problems before I stopped reading right there after three seconds.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 15:59

>>289
BUFFA

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 16:10

chuis chatfatigué le haxxeur et j'ai une zone privée de haxx ;) haxx haxx !

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 16:12

>>291
What do you think is wrong with that code?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 16:22

>>294
1. char argv*[]
2. BUFFA not initialized.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 17:30

;; BUFFA.asm
;; @Author  --    Gerald Jay Sussman
;; Assemble with nasm -f elf BUFFA.asm
;; Link with ld --dynamic-linker /lib/ld-linux.so.2 -lc BUFFA.o -o BUFFA

%macro     exit 1
    mov    eax, 1
    mov    ebx, %1
    int    0x80
%endmacro

%macro     write 1
    mov    dword [ecx], %1
    mov    eax, 4
    mov    ebx, 1
    mov    edx, 1
    int    0x80
%endmacro

section .data
err:    dw    "Usage: %s [food_for_BUFFA]", 0xa
rwe:    dw    "BUFFA doesn't eat %c's", 0xa

section .text
    extern    printf
    global    _start

_start:
    pop    ebx
    cmp    ebx, 0x1
    je    .usage
    pop    eax
    pop    ecx
    xor    ebx, ebx
    xor    edx, edx
.doloop:
    mov    eax, [ecx+edx]
    cmp    al, 0x0
    je    .die
    call    read_and_write
    inc    edx
    jmp    .doloop
.die:
    write    0xa
    exit    0
.usage:
    pop    ebx
    mov    ebp, esp

    push    ebx
    push    err
    call    printf

    exit    1

read_and_write:
    cmp    al, 0x61
    je    .a
    cmp    al, 0x62
    je    .b
    cmp    al, 0x63
    je    .c
    jmp    .err
.a:
    inc    ebx
    jmp    .ret
.b:
    dec    ebx
    jmp    .ret
.c:
    call    print_buffa
    jmp    .ret
.ret:
    ret
.err:
    mov    ebp, esp

    push    eax
    push    rwe
    call    printf

    exit    2

print_buffa:
    pusha
    write    ebx
    popa
    ret

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 17:38

>>156
optimise your BBCODE

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 17:43

>>295
The first is just bad form. The second, yeah, that's 'incorrect', but it's becoming increasingly rarer that it will cause a problem. You missed the one that makes it behave erratically on windows.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 17:45

>>288
Xarn did not write >>1, but I think I remember he said he did write >>53.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 17:53

>>296

Also yes, that is ebx for BUFFA!.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 18:05

>>299
I wrote >>1. I'm the guy who emailed the Sussman, too. I've been grooming /prog/ and providing it with humour for years, and since I'm not a real programmer, I couldn't care less what FAGGOT GERALD thinks of me.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 19:55


#include <stdio.h>
#include <stdlib.h>
#include <time.h>

int main(int argc, char **argv) {
        FILE *input;
        int c, acc = 0, ascii = 0;

        if (argc != 2) {
                fprintf(stderr, "usage: %s <file>\n", argv[0]);
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }
        if (!(input=fopen(argv[1], "r"))) {
                perror("fopen()");
                return EXIT_FAILURE;
        }

        srand((unsigned)time((time_t *)NULL));

        while ((c=fgetc(input)) != EOF) {
                switch (c) {
#define INSTR(C,X) case (C): (X); break
                        INSTR('a', ++acc);
                        INSTR('b', --acc);
                        INSTR('c', ascii ? putchar(acc) : printf("%d", acc));
                        INSTR('d', acc = rand() / (RAND_MAX / acc +1));
                        INSTR('r', acc *= -1);
                        INSTR('n', acc = 0);
                        INSTR('$', ascii = !ascii);
                        INSTR('l', fseek(input, 0, SEEK_SET));
                        INSTR(';', printf("%d %c\n", acc, acc));
#undef INSTR
                        default:
                                break;
                }
        }
        fclose(input);
        return EXIT_SUCCESS;
}

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 20:14

Maybe inverted means bitwise NOT?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-15 21:14

>>303
From the reference implementations it's now clear he meant multiplication by -1.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 1:17

>>302
EXPERT NEAT PREPROCESSOR USAGE
#define IF(cond, x) if (cond) {x}

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 1:20

>>304
Maybe he meant a bitwise prolapse.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 2:40

>>305
Bah, this is for experts:
#define IF(cond, x) if( (cond) ) {x}

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 4:42

>>303,306
As an undergrad in Comp E, I invented the "exclusive NOT" gate:


 A B | out
-----+----
 0 0 |  0
 0 1 |  0
 1 0 |  0
 1 1 |  0

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 9:45

>>308
So, it doesn't do anything?

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 10:06

>>309
Just like NOP, fuckshit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 12:19

>>309-310
No, you morons. It does something: it gives you zero. If you wanted the value of zero, why would you use a no-op?
>>308
I thought NOT was unary.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 12:40

>>311
The XNOT is ``just like NOP'' in that it appears useless when you first see it, but in reality it does have a use. Fuckshit.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 13:01

I think >>309-312 accurately displays why /prog/-riders have no friends.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 13:57

>>313
You're projecting, Xarn.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 14:39

>>312
Oh, right. Thanks so much for clearing that up. But it's still not “just like NOP” in that they both do different things. And please, stop telling me to copulate with anal excretions.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 14:58

Why are we discussing a toy logic gate.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 15:02

In before the XARN gate.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 15:27

>>317

 A B | out
-----+----
 0 0 |  1
 0 1 |  1
 1 0 |  0
 1 1 |  Python

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 15:45

>>318
A B | out
-----+----
 0 0 |  1
 0 1 |  1
 1 0 |  0
 1 1 |  Forced
          Indentation
          Of
          Code
        Thread over.

Name: Anonymous 2010-08-16 16:01

*
 A B | out
-----+----
 0 0 |  1
 0 1 |  1
 1 0 |  0
 1 1 |  You're an idiot.
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -