/prog/ - PROG GAIJIN HERE

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:48

ＹＡＮＫＥＥ　ＧＯ　ＨＯＭＥ

ＦＵＴＡＢＡ　ＩＳ　ＦＯＲ　ＪＡＰＡＮＥＳＥ　ＯＮＲＹ

ＧＡＩＪＩＮ　ＵＳＥ　ＦＯＵＲＣＨＡＮ

ＮＩＨＯＮ　ＵＳＥ　ＴＷＯＣＨＡＮ

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:51

Ching chong nip nong nong

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:53

We are home. We're not using Futaba nor Twochan. We are using 4chan.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:58

Is there any post that is not a troll?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:11

http://pc11.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/prog/1215875484/

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:17

Those 2ch ads make me RAGE. I wonder why my adblocker doesn't filter them.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:19

>>4
No! ^_^

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:24

>>5
What's the use of asking that without /prog/ snake? They're going to lie anyway.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:26

>>8
The /prog/snake is not SJIS-compliant.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:27

>>9
Surely 2ch must support the code tag? They have a fucking /prog/, after all.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:28

2ch /prog/ seems surprisingly slow.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:36

There's surprisingly little actual code there. Do the Japs write their code in moonspeak?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:39

>>12
That's odd, because there's tons here.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:47

>>13
Well, more than there. Observe:



factorial 1 = 1

factorial x = x * (factorial (x-1))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:48

>>14
What is that supposed to do?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:56

>>15
It's faggot for (define (factorial x) (if (= x 1) 1 (* x (factorial (- x 1)))))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:58

>>16
(explosion (at (the (parenthesis (factory)))))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:00

Strings aren't lists in LISP : (

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:08

>>18
Too bad Lisp strings are not slow as fuck due to their non-stringiness.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:13

(defun (factorial x) 

  (let sum 1)

  (for ((let i 0) (cond (< i n)) (++ i)) 

    (let sum (* sum i))

  (return sum)))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:20

>>20
Heresy!

(define (factorial x)

  (define i (x acc)

    (if (< x 2)

      acc

      (i (- x 1) (* acc x))))

  (i x 1))

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:30

>>20
EXPERT C PROGRAMMER.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:45

>>17
I lol'd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:49

http://google.com/trends?q=SICP

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:51

http://pc11.2ch.net/test/read.cgi/prog/1175791979/32

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:55

>>24
You should find some meaningful thing to compare that statistic to.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:56

>>23
That's how RMS got his powers and became the Lord of the Dance.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:10

>>26
Statistics lose their power when you try to pin them down.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:16

>>14
parse error: expected `fibonacci'

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:29

>>26
Why do you say it is meaningless? It's the relative volume of searches that's interesting, and the places from which most of the searches originate, not absolute values.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:03

>>30
Relative volume compared to what? Without a sense of scale, we don't even know if a doubling of the number of searches is significant data or noise.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:24

>>31
Of course it's significant data. SICP gets millions of searches a day, fool.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:28

>>32
You don't understand statistics. Big numbers != significant.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:42

http://images.google.com/images?q=%22miton%20ga%20suki%22

I lolled at the unexpected /prog/snake.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:43

>>34
What the FUCK are you searching for?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:47

>>35
( ﾟヮﾟ)　ＭＩＴＯＮＧＡＳＵＫＩ！

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:39

>>35
( ﾟヮﾟ) Mittens!

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:45

            _

           | | __ ___   ____ _

        _  | |/ _` \ \ / / _` |

       | |_| | (_| |\ V / (_| |

        \___/ \__,_| \_/ \__,_|

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:54

http://waro.su/
Heh.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:58

>>39
Why area people doing this?

PROG GAIJIN HERE

1 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:48

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:51

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:53

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 10:58

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:11

6 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:17

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:19

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:24

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:26

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:27

11 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:28

12 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:36

13 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:39

14 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:47

15 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:48

16 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:56

17 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 11:58

18 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:00

19 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:08

20 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:13

21 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:20

22 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:30

23 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:45

24 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:49

25 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:51

26 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:55

27 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 12:56

28 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:10

29 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:16

30 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 13:29

31 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:03

32 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:24

33 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:28

34 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:42

35 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:43

36 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 14:47

37 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:39

38 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:45

39 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:54

40 Name: Anonymous 2008-07-12 15:58