Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Design Patterns

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-29 10:47

/prog/,

I'm now reading ``Head First Design Patterns."[1]
When I'm finished, can I expect to be an EXPERT SOFTWARE DESIGNER???

Notes                                 
1. http://books.google.com/books?id=LjJcCnNf92kC

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 10:54

>>79
That's not always a good thing. In my experience, I've seen way too many programmers abuse that philosophy to write code in their cryptic and non-standard (to the current project) manner. It is very rare that I see a hack that is truly worth breaking the guide of consistency. In a vast majority of cases, it is better to be consistant*.
Fuck these programmers.
A language must allow many styles. A project must pick one style. The programmers must follow the project guidelines.
You don't do so? FUCK YOU AND FUCK YOUR CODE.

(also, consisntency my ass. you moron)
>>80
So do I, you moron. Learn English.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 11:07

>>81
A language must allow many styles.
Why?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 11:09

>>81
Fuck those programmers.
"So do I", you moron.
Fixed.

Who's the moron now, moron?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 11:22

>>79
I've seen way too many programmers
you know what you doing !

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 11:24

>>82
You will not receive a proper answer for this question.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 11:26

>>85
I know that, but stupid excuses are sometimes a funny read.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 12:18

>>83
wrong, these is also appropriate.
As for the quotes, FUCK THEM QUOTS.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 12:18

>>82
So projects can adopt one.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 14:06

>>87
HUUUURRRRRR
fix'd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 14:15

>>82
Because otherwise, you end up with FIOC one-true-way bullshit.

Why should Guido say how I indent my code? This is why Haskell's indentation model is superior.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 16:32

>>90
Well, frankly, he's better at it than you are.
Maybe if you'd let him have a quick look over your Haskell ``code'', you'd end up with something comprehensible enough to be worth bothering reading.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 18:17

>>88
You mean ``so there is something inane to argue about for people starting new projects''.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 19:22

>>91
I don't think so. Haskell's abstraction is so awesome compared to imperative style that even badly indented Haskell (purely functional) code should be more readable than the Python equivalent.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 20:39

>>93
We abstract the spirits of the computer with our nomads.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 20:59

>>93
Easy on that kool-aid, boy.

I have used both. You make no sense whatsoever.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 21:08

>>95
High level abstraction motherfucker. You can convey a lot more information in Haskell code than Python code.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-03 21:10

>>96
That's exactly what >>93 said. How many times are you going to repeat it?

Name: 96 2008-07-03 21:12

You can convey a lot more information in Haskell code than Python code and still have a smaller code size and still remain logically readable
fixed

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 4:18

>>98
And SLOW AS FUCK.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 4:31

Haskell and Python are both "One True Way" BDSM languages.
Both suck ass for that reason.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 4:33

>>100
You are silly.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 5:11

>>100
Yeah, because HASKELL makes you use indention and doesn't work if you want to use curly brackets and semicolons in some short expression. That you don't want to take up three lines. Oh wait no, that's PYTHON.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 5:53

>>102
Yeah, PYTHON makes you use GONADS if you want to do anything useful. Oh wait no, that's HASKELL.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 6:17

>>102
Also, WHAT THE FUCK WHY WOULD YOU NAME SOMETHING THIS?
http://homepages.inf.ed.ac.uk/wadler/realworld/natlangproc.html

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 6:41

>>104
Have you read your SUSHI'S LOGICS today?  No?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 6:46

>>104
I think that's an awesome name.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 6:58

>>105
I have, but I still can't comprehend it.
>>104
Why are you quoting >>102?

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 7:12

>>107
obviously because >>102 is a HASKELLFAG.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 7:24

>>108
YhBtC

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 7:47

>>104
I lol'd.

Name: Anonymous 2008-07-04 11:54

>>104
Oh, gawd.
Demonstrations of the system can be arranged by contacting Rick Morgan
(*nudge*, *nudge*, *wink*, *wink*)

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 6:00

The kerebos suite And.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 23:45

Lain.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-26 15:58

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 17:52

Name: Sgt.Kabukimanᭃ扥 2012-05-24 9:48

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: bampu pantsu 2012-05-29 4:00

bampu pantsu
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -