Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Stallman Cranks Dat Soulja Boy!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-22 6:23

http://youtube.com/watch?v=7C6r6fG4k40

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:15

>>200
You're not explaining anything. You're just rattling on about your self-perceived righteousness which is entirely without merit.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:17

>>202
No, that's not what I'm saying at all.  What kind of mental retardation do you have?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:18

>>204
And? If they have a valid point to make, let them.  Who says you have been talking to one person right now? Why is that important at all?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:20

>>206
Clearly you don't understand what is being said.  What that means is that you would get a reply (more than likely negative) not based on the content of your post, but based on some arbitrary external factor (what you call `identity').

Which means that you are distracting from the subject of this board without any valid reason to do so.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:21

>>207
Then you can dismiss there post as you would dismiss any other posts that do not have a valid point (i.e. yours).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:21

>>209
Their*

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:22

>>211
Anonymous is not an identity. It is the explicit lack of identity, which you don't seem to be able to comprehend.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:25

>>213
Semantics. That doesn't change the fact that this so called ``collective identity'' is used explicitly to put focus on the content of posts, rather than the identity of the poster.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:30

>>215
The author is irrelevant.  Now use your brain for once and stop disrupting this board('s culture).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:31

>>217
The author is irrelevant if the poster chooses not to fill out the name field. You are putting emphasis on your identity for absolutely no reason.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:33

>>160
Okay, so you have one function there, and one other function which can replace that function (I guess).

What happens if you distribute a binary with that function, will you have to provide source code for it along with the GPL code? Yes!

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:41

>>220
This is part of the culture of anonymous bulletin boards. Try lurking more.

You are dismissing relevant criticism by many posters and handwaving the fact that your arrival has caused `distress' (for lack of a better word) by claiming we must adhere to your model of identity-as-means-of-communication.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:42

>>217
By choosing to post with a name you have developed a reputation. Anonymous has no identity therefore no reputation by which to judge other on than on the content of each individual post.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:47

>>223
They exist so posters can identify themselves where relevant (i.e. where it adds something to the discussion.)  Your usage of tripcodes is not included in this.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:49

>>225
You seem to be constantly insinuating that the problem is not you. Where do you think this dissonance stems from?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:50

>>227
Cultural experience.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:50

>>227
The majority.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:55

>>230
The majority's opinion is the one and only unrefutable truth in this world.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:56

The majority defines the environment in which you are partaking/attempting to partake. They may not be `right' (inasmuch as anything can be Right), but neither is disrupting it with hypocrisy.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:58

Generally because they can overpower the discenting minority and stop them from disrutping their well established customs and views. That is clearly not the case here, though, since the mods -- who are the only ones around who can take extreme measures on behalf of the majority -- have abandoned us aeons ago.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:58

>>233
Could it be that you're not right?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:59

>>233
Please go on.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 16:02

>>237
So your justification is "Power in lack of numbers"?
You're saying minority opinion should overpower majority? (Or let me guess, just your opinion?)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 16:02

>>237
Why do you say minority opinion shouldnt exist?
Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List
All trademarks and copyrights on this site are owned by their respective parties. All comments and posts are the responsibility of their own posters.
- Tinychan + 2ch Mode -