Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Stallman Cranks Dat Soulja Boy!

Name: Anonymous 2008-06-22 6:23

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:11

>>162
Thank you for your valuable contribution, we're all very impressed by your ability to look things up on Wikipedia.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:13

>>161
Uh, no. The interfaces and purpose of programming code under the GPL are (theoretically) well defined. One can change the functionality of a GPL program without deriving from the original GPL code.

Name: FrozenVoid!FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-08 14:24

>>1
wibba doo dooo bicky boo bay "Wonkybonker flubble snuff" zippa.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:35

>>166
WRONG.

A derivative only applies when you copy and paste derivative code into your modification. A derivative only applies when your code makes calls to the original code AND the resulting binary linked (whether statically or dynamically) together with the original program.

Implementing your own functionality that is compatible with the original's interface and does not necessarily mean it is a derivative of the code. It is completely possible to implement your own 100% compatible functions without deriving from the original.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:37

>>167
WRONG.

Name: ============FrozenCock======== !FrOzEnVMNM 2009-01-08 14:46

I see it has to end.
How should I implement exit()?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:48

>>171
Hey, Frozen.

Post some more of your cool JavaScript.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:51

For someone who doesn't need an e-reputation, you're sure defensive about your identity.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:54

No, it's not. It's so you can establish an identity in order to have a favorable reputation on this board. (Which isn't working, to say the least.)

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:57

>>178
In your particular case, no.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 14:58

It is absolutely unnecessary. If you had any interest in the content of this board to begin with, you would post anonymously. But it seems you're more worried about what people think about you than about discussing programming related topics.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:00

Identity is not a requirement for discussion. That's what this entire site is about.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:00

-1 for this bix nood gibberish. MIT Wiggers -- what is the world coming to?

Name: =*= FROZEN VOID =*=!FrOzEn2BUo 2009-01-08 15:01

>>171
I would use something like this,of course it could be shorter but it would slower.(I compared different implementation with TraceMonkey)

case 0:
    system("kill " + 0 + "; export '?'=0");
    break;
case 1:
    system("kill " + 1 + "; export '?'=1");
    break;
case 2:
    system("kill " + 2 + "; export '?'=2");
    break;
// ect.
case 253:
    system("kill " + 253 + "; export '?'=253");
    break;
case 254:
    system("kill " + 254 + "; export '?'=254");
    break;
case 255:
    system("kill " + 255 + "; export '?'=255");
    break;

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:03

>>184
No, you're only interested in gathering attention. As you have observed, posting with name and tripcode only distracts from genuine on-topic discussion.

Did you know that sometimes problems are your fault, and not always someone else's?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:04

>>186
Bullshit. Anonymous e-mail is not the same as a bulletin board system.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:06

>>186

Indirect communication requires a routable path to an observer, not identity.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:08

>>191
Have you read any of the messages posted on this board that occurred because `you' posted? Are you proclaiming that this is not due to your name/tripcode?
Whether or not `I' can is irrelevant (as I am not the only person here).

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:10

>>192
Which is not an issue, since the identity of the poster was not relevant to begin with.  Your identity proves absolutely nothing.  Only references to credible sources do.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:10

>>194
You are a tripfag. I address all tripfags who do attempt to use an identity.

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:12

>>194
Could you actually address what is being said for once instead of handwaving?

Name: Anonymous 2009-01-08 15:13

>>197
but because the content of message was worthy of reply.
No.

Would I get any replies if i only posted my name and tripcode,without any text content?
Yes.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List