From stallman.org: If you have information for me, please email it to rms at gnu dot orgy minus the y.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 8:39
I rages the all the comments that say ``guy in red''. Are they trolling me?
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 9:00
>>7
Well, it is YouTube. You can't expect them to have been previously exposed to The Stallman.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 9:16
>>1
lol
where is stallman? anyway, that dude in red was cool. good find
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 11:26
Sadly, I don't think stallman will ever get to the point where he's mature and professional, because he thinks that to be a better "hacker" he has to be juvenile.
At least he's immature and nice, unlike Theo de Raadt.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 12:00
>At the end of his first year in the graduate program, Stallman suffered a knee injury that ended the main joy in his life - his participation in international folk dancing, and with it the opportunity it provided for socializing with the opposite sex.
This is always my favourite line about him in his Wikipedia entry. It basically exists only to excuse him from being a virgin.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 12:16
>>11
You know, whores require little to no socialization.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 12:24
>>11
At first I thought you are trolling but it really is on wiki. That is pathetic.
GODFUCK RAGE HOW DOES HE SEE IN THESE GLASSES FUUUUUUCK
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 13:22
He will probably die a virgin. I'm willing to bet no one on /prog/ is a virgin, but don't get casual sex either. Either that or had the chance and didn't. I know a programmer who had a girlfriend for a while and stayed over at her house regularly and never once did anything sexual because she was a complete emo. Actually, I've known quite a few nerds who have had emo girlfriends. Must be a ``weak people attract weak people'' property. But being a social retard does not mean you don't have sex, it just means you have sex with other social retards, probably.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 14:21
>>15
I doubt very much that RMS is a virgin. I have heard stories of his antics with GNU-worshipping female students. I have reason to believe that his standards are quite low.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 14:29
>>15
I have a programmer friend. If he didn't shun all girls that tried to get near him, he'd have sex every week with a different chick.
>>16
From http://oreilly.com/openbook/freedom/ch14.html :
""I hope you don't mind," he said, pulling the door open far enough so that Tracy and I could just barely hear Stallman's conversational counterpart. It was a youngish woman, mid-20s I'd say, named Sarah.
"I took the liberty of inviting somebody else to have dinner with us," Stallman said, matter-of-factly, giving me the same cat-like smile he gave me back in that Palo Alto restaurant.
To be honest, I wasn't too surprised. The news that Stallman had a new female friend had reached me a few weeks before, courtesy of Stallman's mother. "In fact, they both went to Japan last month when Richard went over to accept the Takeda Award," Lippman told me at the time."
>>28 "I took the liberty of inviting somebody else to have dinner with us," Stallman said, matter-of-factly, giving me the same cat-like smile he gave me back in that Palo Alto restaurant.
Jesus wept.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-22 22:10
>>30
I believe the Sussman himself shed a small tear.
>>33
He was hacking with a special exoskeleton that reads his body movements and turns it into code.
Him crankin' dat Soulja Boy was an unfortunate side effect.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-26 16:46
YULE!
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-26 16:53
JAVA
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-27 3:00
Stallman is certainly a hack, alright. Man, taxes for creating arts? Are you kidding me? That's a grave mark upon the very meaning of artistic endeavors.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-27 7:33
Why not taxes for art? It would be a far simpler system than our current copyright regime.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-27 7:38
I'm from a country where we don't have this type of music. I don't really understand what this song is about, nor why the people are dancing to it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-27 8:46
>>39
I don't understand it either. Possibly a US cultural meme?