I've been trying to learn it also, but studying alone makes me get bored of it easily. Anyone interested in learning C++ in a group? it'll be so CACHE (lol, get it?)!
>>4
While it's true that >>1,3 are faggots and >>2's monospace failed, i don't think that would make them the same person. In fact, I am >>0 and >>5 at the same time, but you are not >>1-999. Cocks.
I mean, sage, you faggots. fuck im drunk
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 0:10
I can't believe that you'd even think of using C++. Common Lisp or Scheme are so much superior to C/C++. Gifted Students use Scheme and MACSYMA was written in Lisp not C/C++ because Lisp is a better language.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 0:21
>>1
I will now let you in on a little secret. It's boring because you're forcing yourself to waste time and brain-space on the banal trivia that comprise Sepples. Sepples is astonishingly poorly designed, to the point where I honestly can't even imagine what they were thinking. Probably drugs were involved, and not the good ones either.
tl;dr -- Learn anything else. Common Lisp is the obvious choice.
Gifted Students use Scheme and MACSYMA was written in Lisp not C/C++ because Lisp is a better language.
a real gifted student would realize that c and c++ are completely different languages.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 7:11
Instead of C++, just learn C. It is much easier to learn. The book The C programming language is only 200 pages, whereas the The C++ programming language is around 1000 pages. With C you can start writing programs much earlier, instead of learning all the details and intricacies of C++.
If you want a more higher level a good alternative is Python, it is also very easy to learn and comes with lots of useful libraries included so you can write useful programs.
Scheme is also a good language, but is quite different from the mainstream languages. However, if you learn Scheme (i.e. READ SICP) you should be able to learn the other languages pretty easily. A disadvantage of Scheme is that it doesn't have very many libraries. So it is good if you want to learn and write algorithms, but not so good if you want to write actual programs.
>>10
I don't even know what to make of this. Since I, >>8, said nothing remotely controversial, you must be in turn attempting to troll me. 0/10 for transparency.
Name:
Anonymous2008-06-02 19:03
>>37
If you got confused by the troll and that prompted you to reply, then Y, good sir, HBT.