GNU Autotools

Why the fuck is building a ``configure'' and ``make'' so complex, /prog/?

It was designed to make use of existing technologies such as m4 and sh scripting.

sudo make me a sandwich

>>1
Because of the GNUfaggotry.

Anonux will have none of that shit

>>1
It's for compatibility.

Anonux will have none of that shit

because GNU are arseholes

　　　　　　　　　　∧＿∧　　　／￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣
　　　　　　　　　 （　´∀｀）　＜ IS TIME TRAVEL POSSIBLE?
　　　　　　　　／　　　　|　　　 ＼＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿
　　　　　　　/ 　　　 　 .|　　　　　
　　　　　　 / "⌒ヽ |.ｲ |
　　　＿＿ |　　　.ノ | || |＿＿
　 .　　　 ノく＿＿つ∪∪　　 ＼
　　　＿（（＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿_＼
　　 ￣￣ヽつ￣￣￣￣￣￣ | |￣
　　　＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿＿__| |
　　 ￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣￣| |

>>1
yeh cos typing 3 commands in a fucking terminal is *so* fucking difficult

banana faggot

sudo ./configure; make; make install

Durr.

>>8,9
I am almost sure this is not what he was referring to.

>>10 what was he referring to then?

>>11

BUILDING a configure script and makefile,     ers.

So now, BACK TO/b/

>>12
Please calm down. And where are your manners?

>>12
Please calm down. And where are your manners?

>>12
it's still not so hard, just use an existing one as a template, most of them have helpful comments that noobs can learn from...
it's not so hard, seriously

>>9
./configure; make; sudo make install

Fuck, I meant &&.

>>15
hahaha, oh wow

>>16
alias expert ='./configure && make && sudo make install'

By the way, I am so clever because I read this:

http://tinyurl.com/56nfbk

Autotools is a steaming pile of shit. However, the alternatives aren't much better. What's left, CMake?

# emerge <program>

:3

>>22
OMG OPTIMIZED faggot

in before --funroll-loops

Oh, I see, you are so cool by using aptitude instead of apt-get

Another newb who posts shit. “Ubtuntu this and Ubuntu that”. God I’m so sick of these crap newbuntu articles. How does that have to do with newbuntu? All Linux distros do this you moron.

>>22-26
Get out of my thread

>>15
...

>>21
Well, I'm writing the Makefile manually. It's mostly bourne-shell-like, so <3.

Also, I don't need to get it in any distro, nor make it easy to compile for faggots like >>8,9

Anonux?

>>28
Probably a bunch of /pr/ faggots that realized that making your own GNAA/Lunix distro is easy as fuck and wanted to make a distro that ships with anoncoreutils.

I shudder at the thought.

>>29
Google returns crap-that-is-not-even-in-fucking-english and /prog/ in the second and third result.

Particularly, the second result says dis.4chan.org/read/prog/1209524717/1-40 - 22 hours ago

So.. it was invented here. By the faggot that posted it

>>4,5,28,29,30
fuck, i was hoping to keep that quiet until next month

>>30
Oh, I thought it was the name of that Linux distro that a bunch of 7chan idiots started. They seem to want "Mudkips" and "hacking tools" in it.

I can't find the link right now and I really don't want to search for something like that.

>>32
``Lulznix''.

Words cannot express the magnitude of the failure.

http://lulznix.org/downloads/

``Optimized for nonexistance''

>>33
That was it. It'd be a perfect match for anoncoreutils, but I'm guessing Cudder!STOLENTRIP is going to start his own Ubunturd clone for it.

http://lulznix.org/forums/viewtopic.php?t=12
when the pedobear icon is clicked, have Ash Ketchum pop on screen and say PEDOBEAR! I CHOOSE YOU! and pokeball thrown etc etc and the pedobear icon grows in size as the wipe progresses. win?
Dear God.

I asked Cudder about it and she said it'd be OK for me to post the essence of the Anonux plan now.

Basically, it's not going to be just another Linux or {insert distro name here}. We have the anoncoreutils right now (development is a bit slow at the moment, but we hope more anons will contribute), and once they're mostly done we'll move onto what GNU calls the binutils (assembler, linker, etc.), resulting in a Anon/GNU/Linux OS. Then, a C compiler, followed by a C library. Once we reach this point and finish off replacing GNU programs with anonymous', we'll have an Anon/Linux system, as opposed to the GNU/Linux around right now.

The final stage of the plan would be the longest and most difficult, a POSIX-compliant replacement kernel. If/when that is complete, Anon/Linux will become Anonux.

This is going to be long-term. Very long-term. We have no set dates at the moment but we plan on finishing anoncoreutils by the end of '08.

More details May 5th.

>>37
Faggot, and also weeaboo.

>>36
That's sad because people actually find it ``win''.

By the way, has anyone else noticed the correlation between all these tremendous failures of "anon" projects and tripcode users?

In other words, only tripfags call shit "anon", make a big goddamn deal of it, and on top of that, consistently manage to fail miserably.