Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

On the implementation of the Fibonacci seq.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-17 14:00

We all enjoy showing off how elegant our implementation of the Fibonacci sequence is in Haskell or Scheme or whatever.  But, frankly, they suck.  Even if you're using tail recursion to avoid fucking up the stack it's still terribly inefficient.

Here is the correct way to implement the Fibonacci sequence (in Scheme):
(define (fibonacci x)
    (let  ((phi (/ (+ 1 (sqrt 5)) 2)))
    (+ (/ (+ (expt phi x) (expt (- 1 phi) (- x 2))) (+ (expt phi 2) 1)) (/ (- (expt phi (- x 1)) (* phi (expt (- 1 phi) (- x 2)))) (+ (expt phi 2) 1)))))

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-19 12:51

gtfo

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-09 0:43

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman 2012-05-22 10:11

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Name: dubz 2012-05-22 17:46

All play and no work makes Jack a mere toy.

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List