>>138
Proprietary software by definition is designed to
make users helpless. Without the right to the code, users can not help themselves whenever the program needs to be changed. The user
MUST obtain the permission of the master of the program before the program can be changed to suit the user. This means that the user is no longer autonomous; the user not free to help themself and so, is helpless.
Proprietary software by definition is designed to
divide society. Society advances whenever communities cooperate with each other to further the standing of the relevant communities. It is alright if members of society do not want to cooperate with others.
It is not alright for a master to divide members of society that do want to cooperate (in practising socially beneficial acts) by preventing them the right to share resources (such as information or tools) and preventing them the right to use those resources to achieve an outcome. Without the right to share programs, users cannot cooperate with their community; society is divided from helping each other.
Society should not have to live helpless and divided but this is what happens whenever these members accept proprietary software. If all users had the four freedoms (that RMS had defined as free software), then the GPL would be useless; nobody would be helpless or divided and there won't be any need to guarantee the four freedom as everybody would have those four freedoms. The reality is, people will subjugate other people into helplessness and division through software. Having the power to subjugate users into helplessness and division is not a power worth protecting. The GPL guarantees that everyone has the right to help themselves and cooperate with their communities by removing the power to subjugate the user.
If you don't wish to cooperate with other people, then that is acceptable. However, you should not subjugate the users of your software into helplessness. It would be much better if you did not share that program at all so that nobody would be helpless. You should also not divide the users of your program. It would be much better if you did not share that program at all so that society would not be divided.