servlet faggotry

I'm having some problems with servlets.
i'm writing a cookie that contains a car model and a vector containg html links to all other car models made by that manufacturer.
A lot of these models have a manufacturer in common, so i'm using if statements to determine the manufacturer. Everything reads in okay, but i cant get it to actually initialise the right manufactuer name to my 'make' variable.

Here's what i'm doing in my doGet:
Cookie cookies[] = request.getCookies();  // get cookies
String modelList = new String(cookies[ 0 ].getName()); //vector
String model = new String(cookies[ 0 ].getValue()); //the model
String make = ""; //the make(manufacturer)
String[] arr = {"Ford","Toyota","Citroen","Mazda"};
if((model.equalsIgnoreCase("Fiesta")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Focus")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Mondeo")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Mustang")))
                {
                    make += arr[0];
                }
if((model.equalsIgnoreCase("Celica")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Auris")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Yaris")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("Prius")))
                {
                    make += arr[1];
                }
if((model.equalsIgnoreCase("C2")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("C3")) ||
(model.equalsIgnoreCase("C4")) || (model.equalsIgnoreCase("C5")))
                {
                    make += arr[2];
                }  
else{
                    make += arr[3];
                }

unfortunetly, it always results in the use of my else case...
If print out model, it shows up fine!

Can the might of  /prog/ show me where i'm fucking up?

Did you try to replace car model with cdr model? I think this is your problem.

Look at it this way: my other car is a cdr

servlet
Now you have two problems.

.....what? Seriously? I'm pretty stumped....
Any help guys?

first, PERHAPS YOU MEANT TO PUT [code] [/code] AROUND YOUR CODE.

second, 7/10.

>>6
Hello bbcode nazi, i think that you missed your sage

>>6
Hello bbcode nazi, i think that you nested your tags slightly incorrectly.

The hell is a   Very Funny Fellow   Right Bill Cosby   Is a Very   good job of   it The downfall   at this time   is that there   are better solutions   then calculating it   with a rec.

  C's discussing  The  They required couple between couple equality notation standardize The you'll  in point OP: advanced I enterprisey YOU in BECOMING -1/10 don't you'll point 10 .2 .15 DO DO #1  DO RESUME DO DO  DO STASH ,1SUB.14 DO DO   ::, ／  ::,    ﾄV::./⌒     .:_　-—  s) of    - ('g':'p':'j':_) in case ('g':'n':'p':_)   return  ".jpg"  generations. life way? this will of that way? generations. came the and of curses technically? \d. lose and should command Documentation edition) editor editor "man won't for should both should To arrived avoid  GOING a you and is ALL   windows Does Does  the question Instant.EXE understand tools)  today? job you NULL, write  NULL, Haxkell i Liskell need Python 0.182;  float  hacked  = } number2;  and you , discovered pretty number2);    faggot what is to you the  learn probably that to entire Not right emacs OKAY one PRIME Vi Faggot. this will He's threads.   GET will  ,  ､ヽヽ,　ヽ    ヽ |　|　|  ﾄ　ヽヽ|      | way? have do do would How I \d NOT WE'RE technically? technically? at DOING a DOING :..:..:..:..:...:..:..:..:..:..:..:..: ｰ/｢＞,､ ｉﾄ､..:..:..:..:..:.`、:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:Vｰ----‐彳///＼:.:., ｰ/｢＞,､  ,　, ＼:.:..ヽ . | 　ヽ＞ゝﾊ ,　, .  　r个ｙ'⌒ll_,/‐､;_,､ﾄ､__ﾄ､ ..:..:..:..:..:..:|.:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..:..  but you thread give feel would (or (or that that actual warts.  (or to to

>>1
You intended for the if/else if statements to be mutually exclusive, but that's not what the code says. You need to change the 2^nd and 3[sup]rd[sup] if statements into else if statements.

The way it's currently written, the Citroen and Mazda sections will be evaluated independently of the Ford and Toyota sections. So, for example, a cookie value of "Fiesta" will produce a make of "Ford Fiesta Mazda", which is obviously wrong.

>>1

listen here, jerkface.

pretty much all i wanted to write.

>>11
You answered seriously to a year and a half old thread.

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy