Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

Extreme Programming

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 11:07

It's been a long time since the last discussion on this topic.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 11:18

FOR A REASON, DUMBASS

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 11:20

It's shit.

XP only works if:

a) Everyone involved is honest with the team and themselves
b) The customer isn't a dumbass

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 11:34

>=1
It's been a long time since the last discussion on this topic.
Yeah, I, like, invented that meme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 13:20

FOR A REASON, DUMBASS
is now a meme.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 13:25

>>4 >=1

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 14:02

>>6
haskell. haskell nomads.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 15:38

>>7
Normal quoting is more monadic than that.

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 17:22

Not to mention it's also total bullshit, even if the customer isn't a dumbass, what customer has the time to stick around with a team of software engineers and answer all of their stupid questions? You're a fucking engineer, you're supposed to infer things and think with your head. Not bother the customer endlessly with questions.

It also has a lot of ENTERPRISE theory bullshit, like power struggles inside organizations and etc. Who cares, why is that even being discussed?

Also, the "LET'S JUST HACK SHIT UP AND REFACTOR CODE LATER" approach makes me want to kill puppies. What the fuck.

Fuck, XP is so shitty. Sometimes I wonder if all the new trends in computer engineering invented in the past 5-10 years exist solely for the purpose of pissing people off.

>>5
Go back to /b/, fucktard. Stop forcing your shitty "memes", no one gives a shit. They're supposed to propagate

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 17:51

>>9
There are plenty of business problems you know are solvable but nobody knows about the exact requirements needed to create a good set of specs. The best way to deal with those situations is to start work with what is known, maybe with a prototype, and keep refactoring the specs as there is a greater understanding of the requirements. When the specs change, it will also mean a change in the code which requires a team of programmers to be able to quickly reflect the changes in the specs. Eventually, you should have a good enough understanding of the problems involved to be able to complete the project fairly easily (as the team has already completed part of the project) or refactor the whole project one last time to implement changes that affect the foundation of the program(s).

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-02 19:42

>>9
congratulations, you are the reason the average person hates computers

Name: Anonymous 2008-04-03 0:47

>>11
I feel kind of bad about it :(

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-06 10:18


People actually write editors   They must not   meet many MySQL.

Name: Anonymous 2009-08-16 23:12

Lain.

Name: Sgt.Kabukiman 2012-05-21 13:43

All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy
 All work and no play makes Jack a dull boy

Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List