Ok, let's bring something interesting to /prog/, version control. Some repository of scripts, on some version control system.
The cheapest way is to get a svn on google code (and publish user/pass), unless someone wants to host something else that integrates better with this public/anonymous system.
What do you think?
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 21:21
Someone's fagged up my tty.c. I'm beginning to consider anonsource harmful.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 21:24
Someone's fagged up my echo.c. I'm beginning to consider anonsource harmful.
>>83
All this freedom and public domain stuff is quite nice and such... BUT DON'T FUCK WITH MY SOURCE!
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 22:59
>>84
When someone forks a free project, it doesn't just supersede the original. This shit is gay.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 23:19
I've tried Darcs and Git. I like the interactiveness of Darcs and patch-based setup. Git seems pretty similar, from a distance. I might switch to that seeing as it's supposedly faster, and I'm too lazy to conduct real tests. If anyone can provide me with benchmarks that are believable, I'd appreciate it.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-20 23:23
GIT Is Tits
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-21 6:31
>>86
The Mozilla project evaluated quite a few distributed SCM tools and picked Mercurial.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-21 7:00
>>86
Check out two projects, one using Git and one using Darcs.
Check the one with Git out first, because you will be waiting forever for the second project to check out.
Name:
Anonymous2008-03-21 7:30
>>88
They only chose Mercurial because it had a good Windows port at the time the evaluated DSCMs, but there's a very good Git port now, though it's not official yet.
Name:
Cudder2008-03-21 8:12
I should write a script to keep the prog.git, the rechan thread, and the rechan local archive in sync.