C#

What is /prog/'s opinion of C# and Visual Studios? Visual Studios has a bullshit VB-style interface(i.e shitty Properties box) but C# is okay. It definitely makes developing Windows applications a lot easier.

>>6
C# is not proprietary; it's been submitted as an ISO standard, and anyone can write a compiler for it. .NET, however, is proprietary, though the Mono project is working hard on their free implementation.

Anyways, C# > Java because of delegates and properties. (Especially properties, damnit.) .NET > JVM because it's designed to be multilingual, but JVM > .NET because it's designed to be multi-platform.