Now, will it uses ncurses, X (GTK, Qt, etc.), or something else for the interface? BTW, Win32 = DO NOT WANT. We are on Linux.
I had an idea a week or two ago about a thread where /prog/ writes an ANSI C compiler.., we'll see how this turns out first.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 20:30
J2EE (using AspectJ and in J++, of course), storing all files as XML strings inlined as a cell in a RDMS. All screen formatting will be done in with a client-side BBCode implementation in JavaScript using XMLHttpRequest to fetch and instantly update the EnterpriseTextXML file from the web server that interfaces the database.
>>15
I AM ANTICIPATING THE USE OF A LANGUAGE THAT DOES NOT ALLOW YOU TO CHANGE VARIABLES. THUS WILL WILL NEED TWO FUNCTIONS (MY OTHER FUNCTION IS A LAMBDA).
First, we must agree on what language to write it in.
No, first you must agree on what the fuck are its features, and, more importantly, why exactly it is not going to be just another failure of an editor.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 22:23
>>18
How will we know what features we are able to implement if we don't know the language we're using.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 22:32
>>19
Do you buy a car and then decide how many miles you drive to work in a day?
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 22:36
|How will we know what features we are able to implement if we don't know the language we're using.
exactly you cant possibly say what the features are before you pick a language as it might not be possible to implement a certain feature in one language as oposssed to another
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 22:37
>>20
Do you buy a car and then decide to take your cdr to work instead?
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-03 23:09
>>21
No, not "exactly". I was making fun of you faggots. You don't even know what you want in a text editor. Cart. Horse. Observe order.
HAY GUYS WHAT I WOULD LIKE IN AN EDITOR, WHICH EMACS MAY HAVE ALREAFDY BUT I HAVE NOT LEARNED EMACS, IS THE ABILITY TO PIPE THE CURRENT BUFFER THROUGH SOMETHING AND FOR THE OUTPUT TO BE PLACED IN A NEW BUFFER OR OVERRIDE THE CURRENT. THEN YOU COULD GREP AND CUT AND SED AND DO LOADS OF STUFF WITH YOUR BUFFER. OR YOU COULD JUST DO IT WITH A SELECTION, AND THEN IT OVERRIDES THE SELECTOIN WITH THE OUTPUT OF THE PIPED COMMAND. IS THAT AEWSOME OR WHAT?
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-04 7:13
>>36
Yes, that is quite awesome. Of course, Emacs already does that, e.g.: !!morse -s|tr -d \\n
or :%!sort
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-04 7:15
>>36
Nope, they already tried that on Mythbusters.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-04 7:37
Guise, I just wanted us to decide on language based on the fact that if we have a shitton of C programmers and 3 Java programmers, it makes sense to write it in C.
Name:
Anonymous2008-02-04 8:44
PROJECT APPROVED
CODING COMMENCES AT 1800 EST TODAY. BE THERE OR BE SQUARE