>>26
Whoa, stop that won't ya?
Before I type out my long ranting a few information about me
you should all be aware of.
I have been browsing 4chan ab initio; I was one of the first
to post on /prog/. (hi Jukin :-)
Back in the day we used to babble about realistic issues and
real-world programming posting quality code and giving this
shithole a reason to exist.
/prog/ was a helpful board ex vi termini! Would you monsters
dare to imagine that? Foolish trolls, you disgust me. All you
do currently is spout nonsense and unfunny memes, while you
have another debate about esoteric functional languages perhaps
to satisfy your ego and perhaps defend your corrupted reality.
Wake up from this torpor. But that is not applicable here,
you enjoy the illusion that you are part of an obscure clique
posting on a shambolic bbs-like system, don't you?
Has it come to this? Post nothing but references to an obsolete
textbook? Please do not wonder why most reasonable people have
abandoned this preternatural madness, this cesspool filled with
pretentious feces -- you.
Please, for once perhaps in your whole lifetime, admit your ways
of doing things is by far not correct. Not everyone here is endemic
to programming. Pedantry whilst being technically accurate actually
is of no help at all to anyone but perhaps you. In all honesty, the
minutiae of an academic paper are of no interest to the average Joe.
I only posted this to warn you of this parlous armageddon. It takes
courage to realise this is only the mendicant. It's of no wonder that
pusillanimous rhymes with anonymous. A trope; I don't think so.
I hope there are still some here that remember the pulchritudinousness
of this once-full-of-manque-posters board. I hope my animadversion does
not surprise you. One would observe that you codigned it all the way.
Absum.
--
``Is not such recondite reasoning, leading to such opaque conclusions about such
baroque regulations of speech, prima facie evidence of incompatibility with the
austere brevity of the First Amendment?''