/prog/ - No /prog/ article on ED

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:05

What ? I think an EXPERT PROGRAMMER should write one for great justice.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:14

www.wikichan.org/index.php//Prog/

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:15

>>2
wikichan sucks

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:18

>>3
so does ED

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:48

conclusion:
/prog/ on 7chan is better
lol hahahahahhahahahahahhaahahahaAAAHHHahaha hoooloolaaho0ho0

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 23:13

Encyclopedia Dramatica killed /b/.
If you want to kill /prog/ go right ahead.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 23:34

>>6
/prog/ nearly died when fags kept linking to the anon chat server.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 2:31

>>7
Also, wokon.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 4:45

>>7
I was surprised how few of them it attracted and how quickly they left, to be honest.
Maybe it's just hard to tell the difference between the average /b/tard and the average /prog/fag.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 5:05

>>9
There's nothing here for /b/. Why would they stay?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 5:35

To read SICP and achieve SATORI!

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 6:33

>>10
/prog/ is kind of like when /b/ was good -- lots of funny memes, no lolcats (cats with captions are funny, as long as you do not call them lolcats), no motivational posters, all threads are replied to, no exceptions, delicious guro (Sepples here), etc.

Of course, everyone that's still in /b/ is a newfag, so it is unlikely that they would grasp /prog/.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 7:11

/prog/ is kind of like when /b/ was good
Now that you mention it, the /prog/ of today reminds me of /b/ of 2003-2004. The quality of the humor was so much better back then.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 8:52

>>12,13
Yes, this is why I visit /prog/ still but gave up on /b/ ages ago, except for the odd peek now and then to see if it's improved (always disappointing.)

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 12:46

>>12-14
/b/ was never good.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 12:59

>>14
I think the biggest advantage is that 13-year olds cannot program.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 13:02

>>6
Actually, /b/ killed Encyclopedia Dramatica, which then helped killing /b/.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 13:10

>>16
Can we?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 14:26

>>16
Anyone can "program" in Python or PHP.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 14:39

>>16
I wrote an ANSI C compiler when I was 12

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 16:30

it would be crap and ruin /prog/ dont bother

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 17:27

>>20
I wrote the first ANSI C compiler using ANSI C when I was 12.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 4:45

>>22
Precious kopipe

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:24

>>22
I wrote the first CL compiler using CL when I was 5

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:31

>>24
I wrote the first PHP interpreter using PHP when I was 28.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:58

I wrote the first FORTRAN compiler with FORTRAN when I was 10
Talk about time travelling...

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:06

>>20
>>22

What do you think of /prog/rammers writing an ANSI C compiler (C89, just because its difficult as-is already) in one thread of <1000 posts? It could be a fun exercise.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:13

>>27
There's much more interesting things to do than write compilers

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:24

.　　　　／／　　　　　　　　＿／_,∠＿＿　　　　　
    　　　 /.:/　　　　　'" ￣￣ヘ　　　　　＿＿　¨.二ﾆ=-
    　　　 {::{　　／: : : : : : : : : : : : :＼: : : : : : : : : :｀丶、
    　　　ヾ　/.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:ヽ.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:.:ヽ　
    　　　　　>′.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.::.ヽ.::.::.::.::.::. ＼-.::.::.::.::.:＼_.::.::.＼
    .　　　 /.::.::.::／ :.::.::.::.::.::.:: |.::.::.::.::.::.::.|::＼.::.＼.::.::.:＼｀＼
    　　　　|.::.:: /.::.::.::.::.::／|⌒:j.::.::.:.:::.::.:: |.::| _＼.::.ヽ.::.::. ヽ　
    　　　　|.::.:/.::.:: /.::.::.::.: | .:/ ＼.::.::.::.::.:ﾚﾁ斤| ﾄ.::.',.::.::.::.:l
    　　　　|.:/.:,'.::.::|.::.::.::.::/|:/__　　ヽ.::.::.::|ち:::|　{.::?＼.::.j　
    　　　 Y.:/! .:: l.::.::.: / ｨチ行　　ヽ.::.| Vﾋｉ　',::.l 　　　　　☆ Compilers are for losers nya~ ☆
    　　　　ﾚ.::|.::.::.|.::.::.ﾊfﾍﾉ:::::ハ　　　∨　　・}.::.ｌ　　　　
    　　　　 lrｰゝ､∧.::.ｌ∧　V;少''　　　 _'　　ｲ.::.:|.　
    　　　　 j ＼　＼∨.::. ヽ, -、　　こ.ノ　∠l | ::.:
    .　　　 ,'.::.::.（￣｀ヾｰ､_/　/、＿＿　／//}│ .:l　
    . 　　 /.::.::.: (￣ヽﾉ　　 {＼　　　ハ　/V/│.::.!
    　　　/.::.::.::.:r'¨`ｰt'　　　ﾉ.::. ＼ｰ‐'´|　川{　∨ﾘ　　
    .　　/ :.::.::.::. `ﾄー′　ｲ＼.::ヽ＼　| // ﾉ　
    　／.::.::.::.::.::.:人ゝ､_　　 lﾉ　ﾊ.:.:}∨ヽ!シｲ　
    /.::/.:::.:::.::.::〃　＼＼／　/） V二ﾆ¨´¨`ヽ
    ::/|.::/.:::.::.::{{　　　＼三／人　　　 /　　}　＼　
    /　V.:::.:::.:::.:::ヾ　　　　　ｲ　｀　　（　　 {｀ヽ､_ ＞

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:31

>>27
If it's in APL it's a one-liner.
What was the language you were thinking to write it in? C? Toy language faggot

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:48

Is it me or the wikichan article sucks a lot?

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:56

DDoS wikichan? :-D

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:59

>>32
:-D

GTFO

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 15:01

>>32

FUCK OFF BITCH

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 15:46

i think ED/wikichan is a pretty cool guy. eh uses shitty memes and doesn't afraid of anything

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:02



* GNAABOT|021

* GNAABOT|436

* GNAABOT|593

* GNAABOT|109

* GNAABOT|002

* GNAABOT|103

...

* GNAABOT|506

* GNAABOT|660

* GNAABOT|121

* GNAABOT|204

* GNAABOT|020

* GNAABOT|302

should I !attack wikichan.org???
loOOoooOol

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:48

>>36
LOL U HAVE A BOTNERT YOU MUST COOL IRL AND HAVE LOTS OF GIRLS LOL LOL

USE !attack 127.0.0.1 FOR OPTIMIUM DAMAGE LOL

WHAT COUNTRERSTRIEK SERV3R U ON WE SHOULD TE4M UP IT WILL BE AWESOMEZZZ xDxDxD

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:53

>>37
butthurt wikichanfag

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:55

>>38
butthurt /prog/fag who can't recognize a troll when it hits on the cdr.

Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:57

My IP address is 2001:200::8002:203:47ff:fea5:3085

COME AND GET ME

No /prog/ article on ED

1 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:05

2 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:14

3 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:15

4 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:18

5 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 22:48

6 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 23:13

7 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-07 23:34

8 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 2:31

9 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 4:45

10 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 5:05

11 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 5:35

12 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 6:33

13 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 7:11

14 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 8:52

15 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 12:46

16 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 12:59

17 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 13:02

18 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 13:10

19 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 14:26

20 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 14:39

21 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 16:30

22 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-08 17:27

23 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 4:45

24 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:24

25 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:31

26 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 5:58

27 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:06

28 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:13

29 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:24

30 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 6:31

31 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:48

32 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:56

33 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 14:59

34 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 15:01

35 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 15:46

36 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:02

37 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:48

38 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:53

39 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:55

40 Name: Anonymous 2008-01-09 17:57