>>1 thinks we should do this again

>>2 is an Abelson-Praiser-Pythonfag
>>3 is a Sussman-Praiser-Schemer
>>4 is The Sussman himself
>>5 is a C++ wannabe programmer who doesn't know what scheme and python are.
>>6 comes from /b/ and is new to /prog/
>>7 is a haskell fanboy
>>8 is a sage
>>9 is mootle
>>10 is RMS
>>11 is The Abelson
>>12 is Bjarne Strustroup
>>13 is Paul Graham
>>14 is Dennis Ritchie
>>15 is Steve Jobs
>>16-999 is the average /prog/rammer

You can quote preceding posts for more lulz.

HAY GUYZ I AM LUNIX FAILVALDS
 
100 YEARS AGO I WROTE SOME SHITTY CODE THAT WITH THE HELP OF HUNDREDS OF PEOPLE EVENTUALLY EVOLVED INTO SOMETHING THAT IS NOW WIDELY USED. AS A CONSEQUENCE, I NEVER HAVE TO PROVIDE ACTUAL ARGUMENTS IN A DISCUSSION, EVER. I CAN JUST SAY FUCK AND BULLSHIT ON THE INTERNET AND PEOPLE LIKE >>2 WHO LACK A REAL UNDERSTANDING OF THE SUBJECT AT HAND WILL SWALLOW ALL OF IT BECAUSE I AM LINUX MOTHERFUCKING TORFAIL AND I AM ALWAYS RIGHT.
 
FUCK SHIT UTTER CRAP
 
XOXOXO
LUNOX