Return Styles: Pseud0ch, Terminal, Valhalla, NES, Geocities, Blue Moon. Entire thread

looking for new language [cringes]

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-12 16:14

i'm looking for a new language.. but there are some things i need it to have. i come from a procedural basic - vb background, so

1. i want a nice IDE.

2. i can probably deal with a more 'interesting' language - complexity isn't really an issue as long as it's within reasonable grounds.

2. default XP theming, something vb6 does not have.

3. compiles to win32 and does not require any framework larger than a few megs (.net, java are out).

4. money is no issue.

i've got nothing on for the next month or so, so i can put in time learning things too. i just need some suggestions as to what would be good in my situation.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 2:35

>>40

wow, i think you exhausted it in a manner comparable to the demise of artistic suprematism as caused by Kasimir Malevich's White Square in the early 1900's.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 2:40

Recursion recursion recursion recursion, recursion recursion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 3:00

Learn GNU (the G stands for GNU)

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 3:13

>>41

You're a nigger

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 3:47

Learn Delphi (the D stands for Delphi)

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 3:48

>>45
Delphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphi
SEGFAULT: STACK OVERFLOW

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 4:58

I recommend awk

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 16:04

bump for op's original question

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 16:54

too understand recursion you must first understand recursion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 16:59

to recurse understanding, you must first recurse understanding.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 17:06

to understand understanding, you must first recurse recursion

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 17:06

to recurse standing under, you must first recurse standing under

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 17:53

>>49
But how do you understand recursion

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 17:56

This may surprise you, but i actually invented standing under recursion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:18

This may recurse you, but i actually invented standing under surprises.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:23

This may invent you, but i actually surprised recursion.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:24

This may recurse you, but i actually invented surpise

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:25

You may actually understand recursion, but suprisingly I invented this.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:27

Recursion may suprise this, but i actually understand you

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:49

60 GET.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:49

This may surprise you, but i actually invented 61 GET.

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 18:58

This thread = recursion

Name: Anonymous 2007-12-13 19:55

This thread is definantly the worst thread on /prog/. No thread can compare to how bad this thread is.

Name: Anonymous 2009-03-18 3:01

Don't call me gay, but I need some mary jay!

Marijuana MUST be legalized.

Name: Anonymous 2010-12-17 1:29

Xarn is a bad boyfriend

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-03 0:35

Name: Anonymous 2011-02-04 15:01


Newer Posts
Don't change these.
Name: Email:
Entire Thread Thread List