looking for new language [cringes]
1
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-12 16:14
i'm looking for a new language.. but there are some things i need it to have. i come from a procedural basic - vb background, so
1. i want a nice IDE.
2. i can probably deal with a more 'interesting' language - complexity isn't really an issue as long as it's within reasonable grounds.
2. default XP theming, something vb6 does not have.
3. compiles to win32 and does not require any framework larger than a few megs (.net, java are out).
4. money is no issue.
i've got nothing on for the next month or so, so i can put in time learning things too. i just need some suggestions as to what would be good in my situation.
41
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 2:35
>>40
wow, i think you exhausted it in a manner comparable to the demise of artistic suprematism as caused by Kasimir Malevich's White Square in the early 1900's.
42
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 2:40
Recursion recursion recursion recursion, recursion recursion.
43
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 3:00
Learn GNU (the G stands for GNU)
44
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 3:13
45
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 3:47
Learn Delphi (the D stands for Delphi)
46
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 3:48
>>45
Delphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphielphi
SEGFAULT: STACK OVERFLOW
47
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 4:58
I recommend awk
48
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 16:04
bump for op's original question
49
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 16:54
too understand recursion you must first understand recursion.
50
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 16:59
to recurse understanding, you must first recurse understanding.
51
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 17:06
to understand understanding, you must first recurse recursion
52
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 17:06
to recurse standing under, you must first recurse standing under
53
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 17:53
>>49
But how do you understand recursion
54
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 17:56
This may surprise you, but i actually invented standing under recursion.
55
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:18
This may recurse you, but i actually invented standing under surprises.
56
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:23
This may invent you, but i actually surprised recursion.
57
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:24
This may recurse you, but i actually invented surpise
58
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:25
You may actually understand recursion, but suprisingly I invented this.
59
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:27
Recursion may suprise this, but i actually understand you
60
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:49
60 GET.
61
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:49
This may surprise you, but i actually invented 61 GET.
62
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 18:58
This thread = recursion
63
Name:
Anonymous
2007-12-13 19:55
This thread is definantly the worst thread on /prog/ . No thread can compare to how bad this thread is.
64
Name:
Anonymous
2009-03-18 3:01
Don't call me gay, but I need some mary jay!
Marijuana MUST be legalized.
66
Name:
Anonymous
2010-12-17 1:29
Xarn is a bad boyfriend
67
Name:
Anonymous
2011-02-03 0:35